24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,306
T
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,306
Is there any reason not to use copper bullets for hunting?


Life is good live it while you can.
BP-B2

Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,519
P
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
P
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,519
yes and no ,i do like Hammer bullets made of copper and do use some , but i have 1,000`s of lead bullets and lead bullets do work well too.


LIFE NRA , we vote Red up here, Norseman
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
Is there any reason not to use copper bullets for hunting?

Provided that you keep the impact velocities above that of reliable expansion……nope! memtb


You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel

“LETS GO BRANDON”
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,890
MAC Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,890
A couple years ago I got a 308 Win, which was a caliber I never owned. Got the reloading components and began playing with loads. Quit playing when I tried the 130 Gr Barnes TTSX over Varget powder:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Loaded up a bunch of ammo and have been hunting with that load for the last 2 seasons. All the game below fell to that load and all were one shot kills.
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

I see NO reason to use any other bullet. If your rifle shoots all copper bullets well, and mine does, then use them with confidence.


You get out of life what you are willing to accept. If you ain't happy, do something about it!
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 18,261
S
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
S
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 18,261
On the opposite side here. After almost 60 years, I have used conventional bullets, except for a few partitions SPS had on sale for $13 a box. I see no extraordinary use for them except to make my wallet lighter. I found that if one uses conventional bullets within the design parameters of what velocity they were made for, they work quite well with just as good accuracy,if not better. I'd rather spend my money else where. I'd bet more animals have been taken with plain Jane CorLoks than all the copper bullets put together.That tells you some thing right there.

Two things made them popular. People who had magnumitus, as I call it, found conventional bullets do not work at higher velocities and they came to believe the magnums could do more.

The other is is the marketing hype of lead core bullets posing significant health concerns which had been debunked many times with blood test comparing hunters vs non hunters. I believe our local scribe Muledeer posted such findings.

I could post as many photos, if not more, of animals taken with conventional cored bullets that were just as dead. The anti's like them because it throws more road blocks in your way. Funny, many bitch about the government telling us what firearms we may own, but not when they tell us what we have to us in them.

The question I pose is why did you start using them? Laws said you had to? You were looking at lead cor bullets coming apart because you pushed them at 3500 fps?

Last edited by saddlesore; 01/14/23.

If God wanted you to walk and carry things on your back, He would not have invented stirrups and pack saddles
IC B2

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,048
T
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,048
In “standard” velocity cartridges I don’t think they’re as effective as softer lead cored bullets if you stay off the shoulders. Plus I can see no benefit to them on deer sized game from cartridges producing less than 2800fps.

High velocity magnums they’re easier on meat to some extent. Large game like elk, moose, or something along those lines they often give deeper penetration through heavier bones than a lead cored bullet might.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 38,838
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 38,838
Originally Posted by TheKid
In “standard” velocity cartridges I don’t think they’re as effective as softer lead cored bullets if you stay off the shoulders. Plus I can see no benefit to them on deer sized game from cartridges producing less than 2800fps.


This is true. I loaded some 168 TTSXs for a friend's .308, they were in the 2,500-ish fps range. He shot a nice bull through the heart at about 60 yards and recovered the bullet.

Aside from the plastic tip being gone, it looked almost like I could have re-loaded it an shot it again. I've seen other similar photos, I think Brad has some.



A wise man is frequently humbled.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,333
O
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
O
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,333
I live in CA, so I’m forced to use CU bullets for hunting. They work ok except for the 22 lr bullets, but are more expensive.

Unfortunately, other states will probably also require all hunting bullets to be CU too.

Last edited by Old Ornery; 01/14/23.
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,487
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,487
They are great, but expensive. They are not necessary, unless your state demands it. I have used them with good results, but the critters I shoot have never known when they were shot with a cheaper bullet.

Last edited by sbhooper; 01/14/23.

You did not "seen" anything, you "saw" it.
A "creek" has water in it, a "crick" is what you get in your neck.
Liberals with guns are nothing but hypocrites.
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 102,431
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 102,431
I load lots of TTSX bullets, no complaints

IC B3

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,890
MAC Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,890
Originally Posted by saddlesore
I could post as many photos, if not more, of animals taken with conventional cored bullets that were just as dead.

I have also killed a large number of animals with conventional bullets. But these grouped really well. That is a 100 yard group. Not much reason to continue looking for a load when you have a 1/2 MOA at 100 yards.

The question I pose is why did you start using them? Laws said you had to? You were looking at lead cor bullets coming apart because you pushed them at 3500 fps?

I began using them because I got my 308 in the middle of the shortage of ammo and components. I didn't shoot any 30 cal rifles at the time so I got what bullets were available. Barnes 130 gr TTSX and a few others were available so that is what I had to use for load development, not because the state of TX (where I live) said anything about it.

Are they necessarily better than cup and core bullets? No. Is there any reason not to use them? Sure if your rifle doesn't group them or you don't want to pay for them, don't use them. Is there any reason to use them? Sure if they group well and you want to buy them. Am I trying to convince you to use them? Nope, do whatever you want. I'm just answering the question the OP put forth.


You get out of life what you are willing to accept. If you ain't happy, do something about it!
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,597
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,597
Originally Posted by saddlesore
The question I pose is why did you start using them? Laws said you had to? You were looking at lead core bullets coming apart because you pushed them at 3500 fps?
I used conventional copper/lead core bullets for over 45 years. In the late '70s when I rechambered my .30-06 to .30 Gibbs I started shooting Nosler Partitions in it because they stood up better with the higher velocity in larger critters like elk and moose, but I kept using and still use conventional cup/core bullets for my other hunting.

Then, in 2004, I booked an African Cape Buffalo hunt, and I bought a .375 RUM for that hunt. From what I read, the traditional thinking for Cape Buffalo was to use a solid for the first shot followed with soft point bullets. I then read an article or maybe a Barnes ad that said with the TSX bullets you don't need to mix a solid and soft points as the TSX would do it all. So I drank the kool aid and worked up a load with 300 grain TSX bullets. They worked great on everything that I shot on that trip from my Chobe Bushbuck to my Buffalo.

In subsequent hunts with that rifle I switched to 270 grain TSX bullets because they shot a little flatter and Buffalo weren't on my menu.

Then a couple of years ago I booked an Alaskan Brown Bear hunt and wanted to use my .375 RUM, but couldn't find any 270 or 300 grain TSX bullets, but was able to buy a couple of boxes of 281 grain Hammer bullets, and worked up a load with them for that trip.

Ever since the late '60s when I started big game hunting, I've admired and wanted a .300 Weatherby rifle. In 2009 I finally fulfilled that dream and bought a Vanguard chambered in .300 Wby. So 'new rifle, new bullets' and because I had had good results with TSX bullets in my .375 RUM, I decided to load them in my .300 Wby.

I started with 165 gr TSX bullets and used them on a few hunts, then tried 165 gr TTSX bullets and found them to be slightly more accurate in my rifle, so I used them on some more hunts.

Then in 2017 I booked a hunt for Dagestan Tur in Azurbaijan and I wanted to use my .300 Wby. I also upgraded my scope on that rifle to a Leupold VX 3i 4.5-14x 40 with their CDS turret system that allowed me to send Leupold the ballistic data for the bullet that I would be using and they would send me a turret specifically for that load. Since I built that .300 Weatherby primarily for elk hunting, and for many years my favorite elk bullet weighed 180 grains, and that Roy Weatherby made the .300 Wby to primarily shoot 180 grain bullets, I decided to work up a load with 180 gr TTSX bullets.

On the next to the last evening of my Tur hunt, 2 rams/billies fed out into the basin that we were in. I ranged them at 327 yards, set my turret to that distance, fired, and when he quit tumbling at the bottom of that valley, the bullet entrance hole was as close to my aim point as if I had set the bullet there.

I continue to shoot cup and core bullets in my other hunting rifles, but I only hunt with mono copper bullets in my .375 RUM and .300 Weatherby rifles.


SAVE 200 ELK, KILL A WOLF

NRA Endowment Life Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
While we’re sharing experiences……. here’s ours. My wife and I have limited experience with monos, using them exclusively since the early ‘90’s 😉 …..with zero failures. We have both taken game from inside of 30 yards to excess of 400 yards…..that’s pretty good performance!

I have had numerous failures with cup and core bullets on smallish big game animals at far less than 3000 fps. Yes they killed the animals, well all but one…..but the bullets failed to exit (these were medium bore, heavy for caliber bullets) that completely disintegrated inside the animal. Another gave the old textbook “classic” mushroom, recovered under the hide on the offside of a small elk, giving a nice wide frontal area retaining only 60% of it’s original weight. The elk was shot broadside behind the shoulder, hitting only a rib. Yes, the bullet killed…..but time, the bullet was a standard weight bullet fired from a medium bore rifle.

Perhaps I expect more from my bullets than many people. But, if my bullet from a medium bore rifle completely disintegrate or expand yet fail to exit from small to normal sized big game, with broadside hits…..I consider these “FAILED” bullets! memtb

Last edited by memtb; 01/14/23.

You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel

“LETS GO BRANDON”
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,909
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,909
Whitetail deer are only 12” wide through the brisket and the 140 grain TSX from my 7mm-08 made for a tidy carcass with less blood shot than I was seeing with the c&c Core-Lokt or Interlock bullets. A quarter size hole through both lungs instead of the normal lung mush should have warned me that those TSX’s were not expanding well enough and it cost me a lost buck the next season. The tipped TTSX may have solved that problem, but Ballistic Tips have opened faster and resulted in faster humane kills for me.


My other auto is a .45

The bitterness of poor quality is remembered long after the sweetness of low price has faded from memory
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 653
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 653
I use both and prefer conventional even though I killed game with both, in my experience convention cup and core and especially Partitions kill quicker.

Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,306
T
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,306
I've been impressed so far with the performance of copper bullets on deer. I found some petals from Hammer Hunters, and blue plastic tips from Barnes ttsx or LRX. Never found a core, shank or mushroom from any copper bullet. All the deer had exist wounds and some through both shoulders. So far I never could come up with a reason not to use copper bullets.


Life is good live it while you can.
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 14,185
1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
1
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 14,185
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
I've been impressed so far with the performance of copper bullets on deer. I found some petals from Hammer Hunters, and blue plastic tips from Barnes ttsx or LRX. Never found a core, shank or mushroom from any copper bullet. All the deer had exist wounds and some through both shoulders. So far I never could come up with a reason not to use copper bullets.
You never will find a core because they don't have a core.


The last time that bear ate a lawyer he had the runs for 33 days!
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 14,185
1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
1
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 14,185
Originally Posted by memtb
While we’re sharing experiences……. here’s ours. My wife and I have limited experience with monos, using them exclusively since the early ‘90’s 😉 …..with zero failures. We have both taken game from inside of 30 yards to excess of 400 yards…..that’s pretty good performance!

I have had numerous failures with cup and core bullets on smallish big game animals at far less than 3000 fps. Yes they killed the animals, well all but one…..but the bullets failed to exit (these were medium bore, heavy for caliber bullets) that completely disintegrated inside the animal. Another gave the old textbook “classic” mushroom, recovered under the hide on the offside of a small elk, giving a nice wide frontal area retaining only 60% of it’s original weight. The elk was shot broadside behind the shoulder, hitting only a rib. Yes, the bullet killed…..but time, the bullet was a standard weight bullet fired from a medium bore rifle.

Perhaps I expect more from my bullets than many people. But, if my bullet from a medium bore rifle completely disintegrate or expand yet fail to exit from small to normal sized big game, with broadside hits…..I consider these “FAILED” bullets! memtb
It all boils down to what one wants.

I have no experience with the monos, I don't want experience with em either.

Cup n core lead kills very fast for me, I see a lot written on how a mono bullet tends to not put game down as quickly, especially in smaller bores.

No thanks, I want an animal down fast, preferably instant but a 25 yard run is acceptable. When death runs get longer than that I didn't do my part with shot placement.

I don't need to shoot a railroad spike tough bullet on a 250# animal.

Last edited by 10gaugemag; 01/14/23.

The last time that bear ate a lawyer he had the runs for 33 days!
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
Originally Posted by 10gaugemag
Originally Posted by memtb
While we’re sharing experiences……. here’s ours. My wife and I have limited experience with monos, using them exclusively since the early ‘90’s 😉 …..with zero failures. We have both taken game from inside of 30 yards to excess of 400 yards…..that’s pretty good performance!

I have had numerous failures with cup and core bullets on smallish big game animals at far less than 3000 fps. Yes they killed the animals, well all but one…..but the bullets failed to exit (these were medium bore, heavy for caliber bullets) that completely disintegrated inside the animal. Another gave the old textbook “classic” mushroom, recovered under the hide on the offside of a small elk, giving a nice wide frontal area retaining only 60% of it’s original weight. The elk was shot broadside behind the shoulder, hitting only a rib. Yes, the bullet killed…..but time, the bullet was a standard weight bullet fired from a medium bore rifle.

Perhaps I expect more from my bullets than many people. But, if my bullet from a medium bore rifle completely disintegrate or expand yet fail to exit from small to normal sized big game, with broadside hits…..I consider these “FAILED” bullets! memtb
It all boils down to what one wants.

I have no experience with the monos, I don't want experience with em either.

Cup n core lead kills very fast for me, I see a lot written on how a mono bullet tends to not put game down as quickly, especially in smaller bores.

No thanks, I want an animal down fast, preferably instant but a 25 yard run is acceptable. When death runs get longer than that I didn't do my part with shot placement.

I don't need to shoot a railroad spike tough bullet on a 250# animal.

Perhaps they don’t work well with “immature” 😁 calibers…..the smallest cartridge we use (wife) is a .338 WM. The .338 has been very effective for her!

Having taken everything from Fox/coyote to moose with my rifle/cartridge, with very (very) few follow-up shots……I’m pretty pleased with the monos performance! memtb

Last edited by memtb; 01/14/23.

You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel

“LETS GO BRANDON”
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,519
P
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
P
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,519
this was my first year shooting animals with copper bullets and i used a 25 caliber bullet at 3680 fps 103 gr. Hammer bullets this bullet worked well and was very accurate . i got a bang flops so far , on purpose at this large whitetail buck at 125 yards right on the shoulder he was standing there i had the rifle on a rest was a bang flop too ,i was unable to find bullet weather condition was a snow blizzard 15 minutes after buck went down ,we got 14 inches of snow that day below zero weather. we plan on using Hammer bullets next year too . but to be honest 100 gr. Nosler Partitions or Swift A-Frames have work as well in the past 20 some years too. i just like loading other types and brand bullets for fun that`s what a Loony does .


LIFE NRA , we vote Red up here, Norseman
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,430
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,430
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by TheKid
In “standard” velocity cartridges I don’t think they’re as effective as softer lead cored bullets if you stay off the shoulders. Plus I can see no benefit to them on deer sized game from cartridges producing less than 2800fps.


This is true. I loaded some 168 TTSXs for a friend's .308, they were in the 2,500-ish fps range. He shot a nice bull through the heart at about 60 yards and recovered the bullet.

Aside from the plastic tip being gone, it looked almost like I could have re-loaded it an shot it again. I've seen other similar photos, I think Brad has some.

I'd like to see a picture of that bullet. Its supposed to be one of the versions that require less velocity to expand. Was considering using the 168ttsx as a do-it-all in .308 and .30-06.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25,713
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25,713
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
Is there any reason not to use copper bullets for hunting?

Not really.

Nobody is a bigger fan of Partitions than me. Having said that….

Copper bullets have come a long ways and are about as reliable as other premium hunting bullets. This seems to be especially true of the plastic tipped variety.

Secondly, here in the west it is quite likely a matter of time before lead core bullets will be prohibited. Although that may not be much of a factor for you in Georgia.


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,305
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,305
Originally Posted by saddlesore
On the opposite side here. After almost 60 years, I have used conventional bullets, except for a few partitions SPS had on sale for $13 a box. I see no extraordinary use for them except to make my wallet lighter. I found that if one uses conventional bullets within the design parameters of what velocity they were made for, they work quite well with just as good accuracy,if not better. I'd rather spend my money else where. I'd bet more animals have been taken with plain Jane CorLoks than all the copper bullets put together.That tells you some thing right there.

Two things made them popular. People who had magnumitus, as I call it, found conventional bullets do not work at higher velocities and they came to believe the magnums could do more.

The other is is the marketing hype of lead core bullets posing significant health concerns which had been debunked many times with blood test comparing hunters vs non hunters. I believe our local scribe Muledeer posted such findings.

I could post as many photos, if not more, of animals taken with conventional cored bullets that were just as dead. The anti's like them because it throws more road blocks in your way. Funny, many bitch about the government telling us what firearms we may own, but not when they tell us what we have to us in them.

The question I pose is why did you start using them? Laws said you had to? You were looking at lead cor bullets coming apart because you pushed them at 3500 fps?
Blood testing is about worthless for determining your bodies lead load. Lead leaves the blood stream relatively quickly. It hides out in the bones, brain and other tissues for decades.
Mono metal bullets do not work as well as lead and copper bullets as it pertains to killing quickly, but I use them and have been for a long team because I would rather not ingest lead. YMMV.
And FWIW modern lead and copper bullets have worked well in magnums for the 35 years I've been hunting and probably worked well for before that.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,263
J
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,263
I've tried them. My results at the range show them to be adequate, but I get better accuracy with other bullets. Perhaps I just need to tweak my loads a little. The way I see it they are a good choice if using a cartridge that is borderline too small for the game hunted. But for now, I just like other bullets better and price has nothing to do with it.

The money saved buying 200 conventional cup and core bullets vs most premium bullets won't buy me a tank of gas for my truck. I wouldn't buy premium bullets for range plinking. But for load development, getting zeroed, some pre-season practice and hunting, 200 bullets will last me several years. A tank of gas, about 600 miles.

Paying for a premium bullet may not be necessary, but the added costs are negligible in relation to everything else. And who knows, that expensive MIGHT make the difference.


Most people don't really want the truth.

They just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,234
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,234
I hate it when a TTSX doesn't hit any major bones and just pencils through, resulting in long runs...

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
Originally Posted by Whttail_in_MT
I hate it when a TTSX doesn't hit any major bones and just pencils through, resulting in long runs...

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]


So…..how far did he run after being hit? memtb


You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel

“LETS GO BRANDON”
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,234
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,234
A few yards. Less than 10.

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 18,060
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 18,060
Expense.
A big supply of other bullets.
Already have loads using those bullets in my guns.

They offer nothing extra. For the expense and bother.

Somewhere here are 1 box each 22 and 6mm Triple Shocks.
Never bothered to use them.


Didn't vote for Fester.
Oz made me hold my nose!
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
I use whatever I feel like mostly cause I want to try something out. I kinda think I’ve seen enough now that lead/copper softer bullets kill quicker but all copper will pretty much always leave a blood trail.

If it comes to having to use an all copper bullet I believe I still won’t starve.


Semper Fi
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
👍 memtb


You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel

“LETS GO BRANDON”
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 666
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 666
I have killed more game with Barnes copper bullets than others. I’ve seen them used or used them myself to kill Coyotes,Antelope, Whitetails, Mule Deer, and Elk. Cartridges ranged from .223, .243, 7mm Rem Mag, .30-06, and .300 Win Mag.

I started using them in a .30-06 in 1994 when Dad wanted a reduced load for it so I could start Deer hunting. We used the 125 Barnes X. I kept using the ‘06 and it worked so well that when my brother started out with his .243 we loaded Barnes for him. I’ve always been able to get them to shoot in every rifle I have loaded them in.

I like them and they haven’t failed me yet although they aren’t needed for Deer and Antelope, I prefer them because of how well they penetrate. All the loads I’ve done are over 3,000 fps and going well above the minimum impact velocity at impact. I’ve used conventional bullets to kill game smaller than Elk. Obviously they work and will work on larger game as well. I just prefer the Barnes. They are more expensive and the BCs aren’t the best. I prefer the tipped version for easier expansion myself.

Long way of saying, no, there is no reason not to use them.


"...I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, "Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?" Then I said, "Here am I. Send me."
Isaiah 6:8


Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,025
Dre Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,025
I run the ttsx exclusively for all my elk rifles. That include 6.5, 270 and 06. Accurate and deadly.
In off season I run cup and core as they are expensive to fling down range.
Found the 140 sst shoot almost identical as the 130 ttsx in my 270.


All of them do something better than the 30-06, but none of them do everything as well.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 18,261
S
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
S
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 18,261
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Secondly, here in the west it is quite likely a matter of time before lead core bullets will be prohibited. Although that may not be much of a factor for you in Georgia.

Only because we live in a state that rolled over in to blue. I doubt MT and WY is close. With so few Republicans in the legislature now and Polis up for another term, what firearms we may own is may soon overshadow what we can shoot in them.


If God wanted you to walk and carry things on your back, He would not have invented stirrups and pack saddles
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,004
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,004
In the early 90's I shot 2 deer with 165 Barnes X bullets and saw little if any expansion, and I butcher my own deer so I know what a bullet that expands does to tissue. So I swore off copper bullets for a while. Fast forward to 2010 and I shot an elk with the original 165 Winchester Supreme loads in a 300 WSM. That bullet was a copper front with some kind of lead encased in the rear section, but the front was a solid copper. Again not much expansion. In all 3 cases a follow up shot was required.

Now I have not tried the Barnes TSX or TTSX, but after 3 animals shot with copper bullets and less than satisfactory expansion, I am not in a hurry to try any more, especially when conventional bullets which include the Nosler Partion have served me very well. Maybe if I was trying to drive lighter bullets at magnum speeds I would give them a whirl.

Everyone has different experiences and many here and on other forums really like the all copper, great for them, I am not a fan.


Heaven has a wall, a gate and strict immigration policy.

Hell has open borders.

Let that sink in.....

I Live for Opening Day!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
In the early 90's I shot 2 deer with 165 Barnes X bullets and saw little if any expansion, and I butcher my own deer so I know what a bullet that expands does to tissue. So I swore off copper bullets for a while. Fast forward to 2010 and I shot an elk with the original 165 Winchester Supreme loads in a 300 WSM. That bullet was a copper front with some kind of lead encased in the rear section, but the front was a solid copper. Again not much expansion. In all 3 cases a follow up shot was required.

Now I have not tried the Barnes TSX or TTSX, but after 3 animals shot with copper bullets and less than satisfactory expansion, I am not in a hurry to try any more, especially when conventional bullets which include the Nosler Partion have served me very well. Maybe if I was trying to drive lighter bullets at magnum speeds I would give them a whirl.

Everyone has different experiences and many here and on other forums really like the all copper, great for them, I am not a fan.



You killed those animals with the copper bullets yet you believe that you got no expansion, yet straight line penetration. BS pointed bullets that don't expand are notorious for going off line and tumbling.
Instead of estimating expansion by size of exit in the hide, simply pay attention to the damage done to the internal organs



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,363
CRS Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,363
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
Is there any reason not to use copper bullets for hunting?

I can not really think of any, unless expense is a big factor.

Have used a bunch of them on game animals.
53gr TSX out of 22-250
55gr GMX out of a 222 Remington
85gr TSX, 270 Win
110gr TSX, 270 Win
130gr T/TSX, 270 Win
130gr GMX, 270 Win
140gr X, 270 Win
180gr TTSX out of 300 H&H. Shot a little better than the 180gr GMX.
210gr T/TSX out of 338-06
300gr TSX out of 375 H&H
400gr TSX 404 Jeffery

Blackbuck to Cape Buffalo, only a rough guess on number of animals. Conservatively 75, probably a lot more counting in witnessed animals from people I have been with.

Velocity range at the muzzle has been 1850 to 3800 fps.

Have a load worked up for my 416 Remington with 350gr TSX, the TTSX's did not shoot as good.
Going to work up a load with 129gr LRX's this year for one of my 270's.

I have not had any non-expansion issues like some here.

I like them because they are easy to load, destroy less meat, and do not leave lead smears/fragments in the remaining meat. We process all of own animals, so I have seen that first hand.

Are lead fragments in the meat really a big deal? I do not know as I have not read any well designed, conclusive studies on the subject.

With all the being said, I have a pile of lead bullets on the shelf also.

Last edited by CRS; 01/15/23.

Arcus Venator
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,004
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,004
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
In the early 90's I shot 2 deer with 165 Barnes X bullets and saw little if any expansion, and I butcher my own deer so I know what a bullet that expands does to tissue. So I swore off copper bullets for a while. Fast forward to 2010 and I shot an elk with the original 165 Winchester Supreme loads in a 300 WSM. That bullet was a copper front with some kind of lead encased in the rear section, but the front was a solid copper. Again not much expansion. In all 3 cases a follow up shot was required.

Now I have not tried the Barnes TSX or TTSX, but after 3 animals shot with copper bullets and less than satisfactory expansion, I am not in a hurry to try any more, especially when conventional bullets which include the Nosler Partion have served me very well. Maybe if I was trying to drive lighter bullets at magnum speeds I would give them a whirl.

Everyone has different experiences and many here and on other forums really like the all copper, great for them, I am not a fan.



You killed those animals with the copper bullets yet you believe that you got no expansion, yet straight line penetration. BS pointed bullets that don't expand are notorious for going off line and tumbling.
Instead of estimating expansion by size of exit in the hide, simply pay attention to the damage done to the internal organs

Guess you have a reading comprehension issue. I stated VERY little expansion. I also stated that I butcher my own deer so I sure as he!! Know what wounds look like when a bullet expands or tumbles or NOT.

You like them fine, but don't try and tell me what my experiences are when you absolutely were not there to witness the results.


Heaven has a wall, a gate and strict immigration policy.

Hell has open borders.

Let that sink in.....

I Live for Opening Day!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
In the early 90's I shot 2 deer with 165 Barnes X bullets and saw little if any expansion, and I butcher my own deer so I know what a bullet that expands does to tissue. So I swore off copper bullets for a while. Fast forward to 2010 and I shot an elk with the original 165 Winchester Supreme loads in a 300 WSM. That bullet was a copper front with some kind of lead encased in the rear section, but the front was a solid copper. Again not much expansion. In all 3 cases a follow up shot was required.

Now I have not tried the Barnes TSX or TTSX, but after 3 animals shot with copper bullets and less than satisfactory expansion, I am not in a hurry to try any more, especially when conventional bullets which include the Nosler Partion have served me very well. Maybe if I was trying to drive lighter bullets at magnum speeds I would give them a whirl.

Everyone has different experiences and many here and on other forums really like the all copper, great for them, I am not a fan.



You killed those animals with the copper bullets yet you believe that you got no expansion, yet straight line penetration. BS pointed bullets that don't expand are notorious for going off line and tumbling.
Instead of estimating expansion by size of exit in the hide, simply pay attention to the damage done to the internal organs

Guess you have a reading comprehension issue. I stated VERY little expansion. I also stated that I butcher my own deer so I sure as he!! Know what wounds look like when a bullet expands or tumbles or NOT.

You like them fine, but don't try and tell me what my experiences are when you absolutely were not there to witness the results.


Well I see small exits with Cooper bullets and massive internal damage and use them all the time
Seems you think you know more than you do about analyzing would channels

Plus how much more wounding do you need after DEAD



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,097
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,097
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
In the early 90's I shot 2 deer with 165 Barnes X bullets and saw little if any expansion, and I butcher my own deer so I know what a bullet that expands does to tissue. So I swore off copper bullets for a while. Fast forward to 2010 and I shot an elk with the original 165 Winchester Supreme loads in a 300 WSM. That bullet was a copper front with some kind of lead encased in the rear section, but the front was a solid copper. Again not much expansion. In all 3 cases a follow up shot was required.

Now I have not tried the Barnes TSX or TTSX, but after 3 animals shot with copper bullets and less than satisfactory expansion, I am not in a hurry to try any more, especially when conventional bullets which include the Nosler Partion have served me very well. Maybe if I was trying to drive lighter bullets at magnum speeds I would give them a whirl.

Everyone has different experiences and many here and on other forums really like the all copper, great for them, I am not a fan.



You killed those animals with the copper bullets yet you believe that you got no expansion, yet straight line penetration. BS pointed bullets that don't expand are notorious for going off line and tumbling.
Instead of estimating expansion by size of exit in the hide, simply pay attention to the damage done to the internal organs

Guess you have a reading comprehension issue. I stated VERY little expansion. I also stated that I butcher my own deer so I sure as he!! Know what wounds look like when a bullet expands or tumbles or NOT.

You like them fine, but don't try and tell me what my experiences are when you absolutely were not there to witness the results.





What is the difference of "absolutely not there" and plain ol' not there?


Don't ask me about my military service or heroic acts...most of it is untrue.
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,004
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,004
Your lack of comprehension is still showing itself. I doubt one more time will make any difference with you but I will give it the old college try.

I process my own game. I always do an assessment of the bullet path. There was LITTLE internal damage done along the wound channel and LITTLE bruised bloodshot meat. The internal organs were NOT turned to soup but had a small wound channel through them. Every animal required another shot. None fell at the shot.

Again you love copper bullets, I get it. My experience and those of numerous other member here and some other forums that I visit shows that not everyone has positive experiences with copper. Get over it.


Heaven has a wall, a gate and strict immigration policy.

Hell has open borders.

Let that sink in.....

I Live for Opening Day!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
Your lack of comprehension is still showing itself. I doubt one more time will make any difference with you but I will give it the old college try.

I process my own game. I always do an assessment of the bullet path. There was LITTLE internal damage done along the wound channel and LITTLE bruised bloodshot meat. The internal organs were NOT turned to soup but had a small wound channel through them. Every animal required another shot. None fell at the shot.

Again you love copper bullets, I get it. My experience and those of numerous other member here and some other forums that I visit shows that not everyone has positive experiences with copper. Get over it.

Comprehension has nothing to do with my post. Simply put you are full of BS.

I prosecess mine and I kill them with COPPER bullets and your claims do not meet the smell tests.


We have a 6 deer 🦌 limit here and I seldom use Amy bullets that isn't copper

Now I hope your Comprehension can comprehend



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11,036
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11,036
Originally Posted by TheKid
In “standard” velocity cartridges I don’t think they’re as effective as softer lead cored bullets if you stay off the shoulders. Plus I can see no benefit to them on deer sized game from cartridges producing less than 2800fps.

High velocity magnums they’re easier on meat to some extent. Large game like elk, moose, or something along those lines they often give deeper penetration through heavier bones than a lead cored bullet might.

TheKid;
Morning sir or at least it's still a foggy morning here in southern BC, regardless I trust you and your fine family are well.

With the understanding that all my comments on monometal bullets are based on results on local whitetail and mulie bucks only, I'd offer some of our observations.

In about 2008 when the girls had just started hunting I'd been experimenting with monometal bullets enough that we switched to them exclusively. We've used Barnes TSX, TTSX and Hornady GMX in a few different rifles. Also as other respondents have stated, we process all our own game so that helps form opinions on what the bullet did inside the animal.

As well as velocity, I believe that the bullet RPM affects how well monometal bullets do or do not open up. We've seen this in a Swede carbine which only pushes a 130gr TSX to 2650fps but we've not had a single buck stop one. A couple were what we'd consider fairly far away, but since we weren't using a range finder all ranges are estimates only.

Apologies for those who've seen this photo before, here are 3 of the 4 monometal bullets we've found. Left to right they are a .257" 80gr TTSX from a .250AI, .277" 130gr GMX from a .270 and a .308" 168gr TSX from a .308 Norma. The 168gr TSX traveled the furthest through the animal.

[Linked Image]

Somehow I lost a photo of a .277" 130gr TTSX out of the same .270 and it's interesting to note that we found two bullets out of it and that it had a slower than usual twist barrel as well as being a somewhat "slow" barrel so they were maybe 2850fps and slow RPM from it's 11.75" twist barrel.

On perfect broadside shots if one avoids the shoulders, I'd say that a cup and core will kill a buck quicker than a monometal.

If somehow one botches up the first shot and the only shot one has on the wounded animal is either rear facing or quartering away where we'll need to plow through the grass bag first is where the monometal bullets shine.

There's a whole bunch of reasons here where we'll want to stop the animal where its standing, mostly because we're in the cliffs - we're always hunting mountains here but some places obviously are big swamps or valleys. The plus for us is it's all public land so there's typically nothing other than time and the mountain in the way of us tracking down something we hit.

I will admit that sometimes that has been enough that we have not found what has been hit, but where it was hit is impossible to know for sure.

Lastly as you said, they're "easier on meat to some extent" in that there aren't as many secondary wounds that we'll see when lead goes into different places.

I'd say as a broad statement that the wound channel is longer with a monometal but usually smaller in diameter.

Anyways sir, that's been our experience with them thus far - again on whitetail and mulie bucks only.

All the best to you all.

Dwayne

Last edited by BC30cal; 01/15/23. Reason: added the "not" had a single buck stop a 130gr TSX

The most important stuff in life isn't "stuff"

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
On average a cup and core probably has a slight advantage on straight rib cage shot. But i shot a deer this year with a 180 TTSX straight rib cage and the deer went half a body length. That's rather good in my opinion



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
Very well written 👍 ! Thanks! memtb


You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel

“LETS GO BRANDON”
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
Originally Posted by memtb
Very well written 👍 ! Thanks! memtb

BC30cal is an excellent writer and has accurate info



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 956
F
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
F
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 956
Originally Posted by BC30cal
Originally Posted by TheKid
In “standard” velocity cartridges I don’t think they’re as effective as softer lead cored bullets if you stay off the shoulders. Plus I can see no benefit to them on deer sized game from cartridges producing less than 2800fps.

High velocity magnums they’re easier on meat to some extent. Large game like elk, moose, or something along those lines they often give deeper penetration through heavier bones than a lead cored bullet might.

TheKid;
Morning sir or at least it's still a foggy morning here in southern BC, regardless I trust you and your fine family are well.

With the understanding that all my comments on monometal bullets are based on results on local whitetail and mulie bucks only, I'd offer some of our observations.

In about 2008 when the girls had just started hunting I'd been experimenting with monometal bullets enough that we switched to them exclusively. We've used Barnes TSX, TTSX and Hornady GMX in a few different rifles. Also as other respondents have stated, we process all our own game so that helps form opinions on what the bullet did inside the animal.

As well as velocity, I believe that the bullet RPM affects how well monometal bullets do or do not open up. We've seen this in a Swede carbine which only pushes a 130gr TSX to 2650fps but we've had a single buck stop one. A couple were what we'd consider fairly far away, but since we weren't using a range finder all ranges are estimates only.

Apologies for those who've seen this photo before, here are 3 of the 4 monometal bullets we've found. Left to right they are a .257" 80gr TTSX from a .250AI, .277" 130gr GMX from a .270 and a .308" 168gr TSX from a .308 Norma. The 168gr TSX traveled the furthest through the animal.

[Linked Image]

Somehow I lost a photo of a .277" 130gr TTSX out of the same .270 and it's interesting to note that we found two bullets out of it and that it had a slower than usual twist barrel as well as being a somewhat "slow" barrel so they were maybe 2850fps and slow RPM from it's 11.75" twist barrel.

On perfect broadside shots if one avoids the shoulders, I'd say that a cup and core will kill a buck quicker than a monometal.

If somehow one botches up the first shot and the only shot one has on the wounded animal is either rear facing or quartering away where we'll need to plow through the grass bag first is where the monometal bullets shine.

There's a whole bunch of reasons here where we'll want to stop the animal where its standing, mostly because we're in the cliffs - we're always hunting mountains here but some places obviously are big swamps or valleys. The plus for us is it's all public land so there's typically nothing other than time and the mountain in the way of us tracking down something we hit.

I will admit that sometimes that has been enough that we have not found what has been hit, but where it was hit is impossible to know for sure.

Lastly as you said, they're "easier on meat to some extent" in that there aren't as many secondary wounds that we'll see when lead goes into different places.

I'd say as a broad statement that the wound channel is longer with a monometal but usually smaller in diameter.

Anyways sir, that's been our experience with them thus far - again on whitetail and mulie bucks only.

All the best to you all.

Dwayne

Dwayne,

In a world that has become increasingly uncivil, especially in regard to differing opinions, I always enjoy reading your posts. They're always based in real world experience and are presented without the intent to provoke offense. You're also not unduly offended when someone disagrees with you.

I hope you have an excellent day and that you and your family are well. I'll look forward to your next post.

Frank

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 956
F
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
F
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 956
Originally Posted by MAC
A couple years ago I got a 308 Win, which was a caliber I never owned. Got the reloading components and began playing with loads. Quit playing when I tried the 130 Gr Barnes TTSX over Varget powder:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Loaded up a bunch of ammo and have been hunting with that load for the last 2 seasons. All the game below fell to that load and all were one shot kills.
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

I see NO reason to use any other bullet. If your rifle shoots all copper bullets well, and mine does, then use them with confidence.

Darn big cat. Congratulations.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25,713
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25,713
Originally Posted by saddlesore
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Secondly, here in the west it is quite likely a matter of time before lead core bullets will be prohibited. Although that may not be much of a factor for you in Georgia.

Only because we live in a state that rolled over in to blue. I doubt MT and WY is close. With so few Republicans in the legislature now and Polis up for another term, what firearms we may own is may soon overshadow what we can shoot in them.

Stop it SS.
Although I’m probably more unhappy than you about Colorado being invaded by lifestyle immigrants and their politics, the science behind lead toxicity, the levels of lead toxicity in raptors, and the effect of lead toxicity on raptors, is sound.
No different than the lead shot debate 35+ years ago. Deja Vu all over again…..


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,004
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,004
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
Your lack of comprehension is still showing itself. I doubt one more time will make any difference with you but I will give it the old college try.

I process my own game. I always do an assessment of the bullet path. There was LITTLE internal damage done along the wound channel and LITTLE bruised bloodshot meat. The internal organs were NOT turned to soup but had a small wound channel through them. Every animal required another shot. None fell at the shot.

Again you love copper bullets, I get it. My experience and those of numerous other member here and some other forums that I visit shows that not everyone has positive experiences with copper. Get over it.

Comprehension has nothing to do with my post. Simply put you are full of BS.

I prosecess mine and I kill them with COPPER bullets and your claims do not meet the smell tests.


We have a 6 deer 🦌 limit here and I seldom use Amy bullets that isn't copper

Now I hope your Comprehension can comprehend

Yea your the man........NOT.


Heaven has a wall, a gate and strict immigration policy.

Hell has open borders.

Let that sink in.....

I Live for Opening Day!
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,477
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,477
Reasons to:
Health concerns
Your gun shoots them well
Your shots stay mostly under 500 ish yards give or take

Reasons not to:
Your rifle lacks the speed needed to make them expand
Lousy BC’s
You shoot/hunt long range
You like lead in your pencil

Last edited by SDHNTR; 01/15/23.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 18,261
S
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
S
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 18,261
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by saddlesore
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Secondly, here in the west it is quite likely a matter of time before lead core bullets will be prohibited. Although that may not be much of a factor for you in Georgia.

Only because we live in a state that rolled over in to blue. I doubt MT and WY is close. With so few Republicans in the legislature now and Polis up for another term, what firearms we may own is may soon overshadow what we can shoot in them.

Stop it SS.
Although I’m probably more unhappy than you about Colorado being invaded by lifestyle immigrants and their politics, the science behind lead toxicity, the levels of lead toxicity in raptors, and the effect of lead toxicity on raptors, is sound.
No different than the lead shot debate 35+ years ago. Deja Vu all over again…..


Maybe raptors and water fowl, but not humans. As far as I know birds grind their food in he gizzards. Not so with humans. Lead dust in your lungs will kill you. Not so much, lead particles ingested and passed thru the intestines. I have stacked tons of lead shot and bricks for radiation shielding and have eaten lead killed rabbits, squirrels, elk deer, antelope, drank water from lead pipes when young. Many cities still deliver water in lead pipes, (Colorado Springs being one of them), many homes still have soldered copper pipe in them. Asbestos is killing me, but not lead. Only have to do a simple search of hunters
using lead bullets to see there is no viable proof. Here is one such article. https://www.themeateater.com/hunt/f...ldlife-separating-science-from-advocacy. Another farce brought on by the anti's, about like gas stoves being dangerous now.

Last edited by saddlesore; 01/15/23.

If God wanted you to walk and carry things on your back, He would not have invented stirrups and pack saddles
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25,713
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25,713
Dwayne,
I too always appreciate your posts!

I have a couple friends who I call “copper loonys” and they have been using copper bullets almost exclusively for more than a decade. Mostly out of SA chamberings. Whenever they can draw a tag they often hunt two or more states each fall.

They have come to like the E Tips for performance on game, although they think the ETips can be a bit more picky when developing loads.


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,890
MAC Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,890
Originally Posted by fshaw
Darn big cat. Congratulations.

Thanks. 46 inches from nose to the tip of the tail. Biggest bobcat I have ever seen.

For all those saying that copper bullets do not expand I'd like you to look at this photo. That is the exit wound on a pronghorn buck shot with a 130 gr Barnes TTSX loaded with Varget Powder for a velocity of 2896 fps (per the Barnes data) and it cut an exit hole bigger than a 50 cent piece. Bullet hit the lower lungs and the top of the heart. Both lungs were shredded and the heart was completely detached from the arteries and veins at the top. What more can you ask for?

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


You get out of life what you are willing to accept. If you ain't happy, do something about it!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25,713
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25,713
Lol……!


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
My only reason for not shooting copper full time is the amount & comfort I have for c&c or partitions. If I were starting over I’d go copper 100%

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
Your lack of comprehension is still showing itself. I doubt one more time will make any difference with you but I will give it the old college try.

I process my own game. I always do an assessment of the bullet path. There was LITTLE internal damage done along the wound channel and LITTLE bruised bloodshot meat. The internal organs were NOT turned to soup but had a small wound channel through them. Every animal required another shot. None fell at the shot.

Again you love copper bullets, I get it. My experience and those of numerous other member here and some other forums that I visit shows that not everyone has positive experiences with copper. Get over it.

Comprehension has nothing to do with my post. Simply put you are full of BS.

I prosecess mine and I kill them with COPPER bullets and your claims do not meet the smell tests.


We have a 6 deer 🦌 limit here and I seldom use Amy bullets that isn't copper

Now I hope your Comprehension can comprehend

Yea your the man........NOT.


LMAO 😆 , you are the only one claiming that they don't open and don't inflict major damage



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 29,721
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 29,721
Originally Posted by BWalker
Blood testing is about worthless for determining your bodies lead load. Lead leaves the blood stream relatively quickly. It hides out in the bones, brain and other tissues for decades.
Mono metal bullets do not work as well as lead and copper bullets as it pertains to killing quickly, but I use them and have been for a long team because I would rather not ingest lead.

Originally Posted by alpinecrick
[ the science behind lead toxicity, the levels of lead toxicity in raptors, and the effect of lead toxicity on raptors, is sound.
No different than the lead shot debate 35+ years ago. Deja Vu all over again…..


As Smokepole referenced, I've had at least three mono failures (by "failure" I mean non-expansion), and combining friends experiences that number goes into the dozens. Mono's do "fail" more consistently than standard bullets. However, as I've gotten older, and hopefully a bit more thoughtful, I've come around to the thinking expressed by Ben and Casey above. The science is "in" and is essentially irrefutable. If you like staring at silica below ground level, go for it - I'll take the science.

Having said all that, all things being equal, I am fairly certain lead/copper bullets kill more quickly and consistently than mono bullets. OTOH, dead is dead even if a dozen yards further. If I were younger and starting out I'd run mono's in everything. Since I have thousand's of lead/copper bullets on hand and am over 60 years old, I doubt I'll change what I do.

Mono's are the future and rightfully so.


“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,004
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,004
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
Your lack of comprehension is still showing itself. I doubt one more time will make any difference with you but I will give it the old college try.

I process my own game. I always do an assessment of the bullet path. There was LITTLE internal damage done along the wound channel and LITTLE bruised bloodshot meat. The internal organs were NOT turned to soup but had a small wound channel through them. Every animal required another shot. None fell at the shot.

Again you love copper bullets, I get it. My experience and those of numerous other member here and some other forums that I visit shows that not everyone has positive experiences with copper. Get over it.

Comprehension has nothing to do with my post. Simply put you are full of BS.

I prosecess mine and I kill them with COPPER bullets and your claims do not meet the smell tests.


We have a 6 deer 🦌 limit here and I seldom use Amy bullets that isn't copper

Now I hope your Comprehension can comprehend

Yea your the man........NOT.


LMAO 😆 , you are the only one claiming that they don't open and don't inflict major damage

Oh really, why don't you PM a member here named Brad, for starters.


Heaven has a wall, a gate and strict immigration policy.

Hell has open borders.

Let that sink in.....

I Live for Opening Day!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
Your lack of comprehension is still showing itself. I doubt one more time will make any difference with you but I will give it the old college try.

I process my own game. I always do an assessment of the bullet path. There was LITTLE internal damage done along the wound channel and LITTLE bruised bloodshot meat. The internal organs were NOT turned to soup but had a small wound channel through them. Every animal required another shot. None fell at the shot.

Again you love copper bullets, I get it. My experience and those of numerous other member here and some other forums that I visit shows that not everyone has positive experiences with copper. Get over it.

Comprehension has nothing to do with my post. Simply put you are full of BS.

I prosecess mine and I kill them with COPPER bullets and your claims do not meet the smell tests.


We have a 6 deer 🦌 limit here and I seldom use Amy bullets that isn't copper

Now I hope your Comprehension can comprehend

Yea your the man........NOT.


LMAO 😆 , you are the only one claiming that they don't open and don't inflict major damage

Oh really, why don't you PM a member here named Brad, for starters.

I don't need to PM Brad I kill more deer per year, since we a 6 deer limit. I posted that already





Originally Posted by TakeEm
I have killed more game with Barnes copper bullets than others. I’ve seen them used or used them myself to kill Coyotes,Antelope, Whitetails, Mule Deer, and Elk. Cartridges ranged from .223, .243, 7mm Rem Mag, .30-06, and .300 Win Mag.

I started using them in a .30-06 in 1994 when Dad wanted a reduced load for it so I could start Deer hunting. We used the 125 Barnes X. I kept using the ‘06 and it worked so well that when my brother started out with his .243 we loaded Barnes for him. I’ve always been able to get them to shoot in every rifle I have loaded them in.

I like them and they haven’t failed me yet although they aren’t needed for Deer and Antelope, I prefer them because of how well they penetrate. All the loads I’ve done are over 3,000 fps and going well above the minimum impact velocity at impact. I’ve used conventional bullets to kill game smaller than Elk. Obviously they work and will work on larger game as well. I just prefer the Barnes. They are more expensive and the BCs aren’t the best. I prefer the tipped version for easier expansion myself.

Long way of saying, no, there is no reason not to use them.



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,234
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,234
Originally Posted by SDHNTR
Reasons not to:
Your rifle lacks the speed needed to make them expand

How much is needed? Below is a LRX I dug out of the ground after a hundred yard rib shot on a deer. MV was a sedate 2675 fps. Exit wound indicated it expanded before hitting terra firma.
[Linked Image]

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,234
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,234
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
They have come to like the E Tips for performance on game, although they think the ETips can be a bit more picky when developing loads.

Those expand in elk flesh too.
[Linked Image]

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25,713
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25,713
Brad,
I’ve had, and witnessed, the original X Bullets fail to expand (or at least appear to) but plastic tipped copper bullets have all appeared to open up, penetrate, and track as reliably as Partitions.

Is that what you are referring to or did you have a different kind of failure?

I have witnessed and experienced failures to penetrate and/or breakup with c&c bullets, included bonded bullets, that are favorites here on the ‘fire.


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
The thing with monos is that they seem not to fragment to the level that traditional c&c or partition type bullets do thereby limiting their killing power to the intact portion of bullet itself. That can become a variable in and of itself should the actual bullet expand less or more depending on resistance provided by the target. Traditional bullets can’t help but lose weight & enhance killing power by creating many micro-wound channels & almost creating the ability to be more predictable given a certain shot placement in expectation of this occurrence.

Penetration is another conversation and this is what we are all currently told matters most…until it’s doesn’t. How much penetration, given each game animal, do we actually need? For example: 20”+ penetration on a whitetail seems unnecessary.

I’ve killed probably 30 bucks with a 6mm 85gr BTSP & even more with a 130gr Speer SP that never moved out of their hoof prints. I’ve probably only shot 15-20 animals with a mono but none of them responded like I described above - often running off a bit but mostly all feature an exit. Most of the time an animal running off becomes its own problem both for follow up shots and/or retrieval.

I accept & agree that monos have their place - we should each choose a bullet that gets suits the shot we expect to take at the range we expect to take the shot at to obtain the cleanest possible, most humane kill.

*Scientifically I fully understand that my experience is mathematically unimportant and the scale of my experience is painfully small - BUT - if I need a Mono I will use it. If I need a c&c I will use it. No bullet can possibly cover all variables despite marketing hype claiming otherwise.

Just my .02 & fully accept my bias.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11,036
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11,036
alpinecrick;
Good afternoon to you sir, I hope you're getting weather you need on the West Slope and you're well.

Thanks very much for the kind words - and to the others who were gracious to me as well, I do appreciate it and will do my best to deserve them in future posts.

Regarding Nosler E-Tips, a friend and hunting/shooting partner uses them in a couple rifles, one a .308 in which he's running the 150gr and he's happy with them.

Honestly over the past several years up here component supply has been variable at best to the point where we'll use what we can get.

That's very much one reason we're still running TSX in a couple rifles instead of TTSX, because we found they worked and I bought what I hoped was at least a decade or two worth of them. Now to be sure we just use them for hunting and confirming zero, then fool with bullets we are able to find for other practice.

There's many roads to Mecca and all that for sure alpinecrick and this just happens to be the one we've ended up taking is all.

Thanks again for the kind words and all the best in the upcoming week.

Dwayne


The most important stuff in life isn't "stuff"

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
So do you think maybe we blame some of the older iterations of mono’s and continue holding the grudge on todays well made bullets. I don’t have near the amount of kills as some and I do think in deer monos aren’t needed but man the ones that have been shot seemed fine. There are a few that I think way further than the should’ve gone but they’re still dead at the end of the trail.

I think arguing about what another guy chooses is akin to the my 30-06 kills better than a 270…. The sheer numbers of animals and combos to prove a darned thing would take 100 of us hunting non stop to prove anything, even if that was enough not to mention the sheer crazy amount of combinations.

Dwayne’s post about RPMs seeming to help with them is music to my ears and kinda what I’ve thought to myself for awhile.

Just my thought though.

I’m looking forward to hearing how CRS’s 1-8 twisted 270 works for him with TTSXs. I’m kinda betting it’ll be a massive blender.

Last edited by beretzs; 01/15/23.

Semper Fi
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
Originally Posted by PintsofCraft
The thing with monos is that they seem not to fragment to the level that traditional c&c or partition type bullets do thereby limiting their killing power to the intact portion of bullet itself. That can become a variable in and of itself should the actual bullet expand less or more depending on resistance provided by the target. Traditional bullets can’t help but lose weight & enhance killing power by creating many micro-wound channels & almost creating the ability to be more predictable given a certain shot placement in expectation of this occurrence.

Penetration is another conversation and this is what we are all currently told matters most…until it’s doesn’t. How much penetration, given each game animal, do we actually need? For example: 20”+ penetration on a whitetail seems unnecessary.

I’ve killed probably 30 bucks with a 6mm 85gr BTSP & even more with a 130gr Speer SP that never moved out of their hoof prints. I’ve probably only shot 15-20 animals with a mono but none of them responded like I described above - often running off a bit but mostly all feature an exit. Most of the time an animal running off becomes its own problem both for follow up shots and/or retrieval.

I accept & agree that monos have their place - we should each choose a bullet that gets suits the shot we expect to take at the range we expect to take the shot at to obtain the cleanest possible, most humane kill.

*Scientifically I fully understand that my experience is mathematically unimportant and the scale of my experience is painfully small - BUT - if I need a Mono I will use it. If I need a c&c I will use it. No bullet can possibly cover all variables despite marketing hype claiming otherwise.

Just my .02 & fully accept my bias.


#heretic

whistle


Semper Fi
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11,036
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11,036
beretzs;
Good afternoon my cyber friend, I hope the day in your part of the world is treating you acceptably and you're all well.

For sure and certain I've been a proponent of projectile RPM playing a role in how the bullet opens and then the resulting tissue damage for a fairly long time now.

Here is a link to the RPM calculator that I've used to come up with some rough numbers.

https://www.accurateshooter.com/technical-articles/calculating-bullet-rpm-spin-rates-stability/

About 10 years back we were seeing that the tissue damage resulting from our daughter's 6.5 Swede using 130gr TSX was equal or greater than the damage from the .270 which was also shooting 130gr TTSX or GMX bullets out of, despite the fact that the .270 started them out nearly 250fps faster.

Here's a thread from that timeframe.

https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbt.../tissue-damage-270-vs-6-5x55#Post9248055

Regarding CRS's 1:8 twist .270, I recall my late cyber friend BobinNH made a point of telling me his .270's were running 1:9 barrels and he was looking at trying faster twists in the future. If he did or not before he passed, I'm not positive.

For sure some will be frustrated by others such as myself who admittedly enjoy minutia and diving down rabbit holes. Some will say "killing a deer isn't that complicated" and that's certainly true too.

That said, folks wired in the way I appear to have been from the factory like to know the "why" when they see something, though I'm the first to admit it's not been an inexpensive way to live sometimes, nor has it always led me to firm conclusions. Often more questions usually... grin

All the best to you all.

Dwayne


The most important stuff in life isn't "stuff"

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
Originally Posted by BC30cal
beretzs;
Good afternoon my cyber friend, I hope the day in your part of the world is treating you acceptably and you're all well.

For sure and certain I've been a proponent of projectile RPM playing a role in how the bullet opens and then the resulting tissue damage for a fairly long time now.

Here is a link to the RPM calculator that I've used to come up with some rough numbers.

https://www.accurateshooter.com/technical-articles/calculating-bullet-rpm-spin-rates-stability/

About 10 years back we were seeing that the tissue damage resulting from our daughter's 6.5 Swede using 130gr TSX was equal or greater than the damage from the .270 which was also shooting 130gr TTSX or GMX bullets out of, despite the fact that the .270 started them out nearly 250fps faster.

Here's a thread from that timeframe.

https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbt.../tissue-damage-270-vs-6-5x55#Post9248055

Regarding CRS's 1:8 twist .270, I recall my late cyber friend BobinNH made a point of telling me his .270's were running 1:9 barrels and he was looking at trying faster twists in the future. If he did or not before he passed, I'm not positive.

For sure some will be frustrated by others such as myself who admittedly enjoy minutia and diving down rabbit holes. Some will say "killing a deer isn't that complicated" and that's certainly true too.

That said, folks wired in the way I appear to have been from the factory like to know the "why" when they see something, though I'm the first to admit it's not been an inexpensive way to live sometimes, nor has it always led me to firm conclusions. Often more questions usually... grin

All the best to you all.

Dwayne

Bob / RinB was the fellas that got me started on what 10-15 years ago was considered crazy amounts of twist.

Today it’s a bit more common.

RPMs don’t hurt bullet performance and to my eyes they make great bullets work even better.

Hope you’re having a helluva good evening.


Semper Fi
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 29,721
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 29,721
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Brad,
I’ve had, and witnessed, the original X Bullets fail to expand (or at least appear to) but plastic tipped copper bullets have all appeared to open up, penetrate, and track as reliably as Partitions.

Is that what you are referring to or did you have a different kind of failure?

I have witnessed and experienced failures to penetrate and/or breakup with c&c bullets, included bonded bullets, that are favorites here on the ‘fire.

I had the original X, Failsafe and a TTSX (yes, tipped) fail to open. Friends mostly experienced failures with the TSX. So yeah, failures with mono's 1.0 and 2.0 were understandable, but a TTSX failing to open is another thing. Still, I think despite the occasional failure of mono 3.0's to open, they're still a better choice than lead/copper bullets for all the reason's you and Ben stated.


“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
Originally Posted by beretzs
Originally Posted by PintsofCraft
The thing with monos is that they seem not to fragment to the level that traditional c&c or partition type bullets do thereby limiting their killing power to the intact portion of bullet itself. That can become a variable in and of itself should the actual bullet expand less or more depending on resistance provided by the target. Traditional bullets can’t help but lose weight & enhance killing power by creating many micro-wound channels & almost creating the ability to be more predictable given a certain shot placement in expectation of this occurrence.

Penetration is another conversation and this is what we are all currently told matters most…until it’s doesn’t. How much penetration, given each game animal, do we actually need? For example: 20”+ penetration on a whitetail seems unnecessary.

I’ve killed probably 30 bucks with a 6mm 85gr BTSP & even more with a 130gr Speer SP that never moved out of their hoof prints. I’ve probably only shot 15-20 animals with a mono but none of them responded like I described above - often running off a bit but mostly all feature an exit. Most of the time an animal running off becomes its own problem both for follow up shots and/or retrieval.

I accept & agree that monos have their place - we should each choose a bullet that gets suits the shot we expect to take at the range we expect to take the shot at to obtain the cleanest possible, most humane kill.

*Scientifically I fully understand that my experience is mathematically unimportant and the scale of my experience is painfully small - BUT - if I need a Mono I will use it. If I need a c&c I will use it. No bullet can possibly cover all variables despite marketing hype claiming otherwise.

Just my .02 & fully accept my bias.


#heretic

whistle


Hahaha. Not trying to be but still might be 👍🏼😜

Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
I have to fully admit that the health benefits sure support Monos - I just don’t personally have 100% confidence in them. I’ll
Attribute this attitude to me not having enough experience with Monos.

Long way of saying that I’m open minded

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,363
CRS Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,363
Originally Posted by beretzs
I’m looking forward to hearing how CRS’s 1-8 twisted 270 works for him with TTSXs. I’m kinda betting it’ll be a massive blender.

Me too!
I have a rpm theory, but not enough in field experience to ponder here yet. Lest I get crucified by those that "know". cool

The fast twist is going to get a 129 LRX load worked up in addition to the heavies.

The LRX has a sleeker ogive than the TTSX and the current TSX.
The first TSX's had a similar ogive.


Arcus Venator
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
Originally Posted by CRS
Originally Posted by beretzs
I’m looking forward to hearing how CRS’s 1-8 twisted 270 works for him with TTSXs. I’m kinda betting it’ll be a massive blender.

Me too!
I have a rpm theory, but not enough in field experience to ponder here yet. Lest I get crucified by those that "know". cool

The fast twist is going to get a 129 LRX load worked up in addition to the heavies.

The LRX has a sleeker ogive than the TTSX and the current TSX.
The first TSX's had a similar ogive.

I want in on the blender effect!

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
Originally Posted by PintsofCraft
Originally Posted by CRS
Originally Posted by beretzs
I’m looking forward to hearing how CRS’s 1-8 twisted 270 works for him with TTSXs. I’m kinda betting it’ll be a massive blender.

Me too!
I have a rpm theory, but not enough in field experience to ponder here yet. Lest I get crucified by those that "know". cool

The fast twist is going to get a 129 LRX load worked up in addition to the heavies.

The LRX has a sleeker ogive than the TTSX and the current TSX.
The first TSX's had a similar ogive.

I want in on the blender effect!


I've taken deer 🦌 and Antelope that have a smallish exit in the hide and when I opened them up the vitals looked like a BLENDER went through them

I have a 10 twist 35 Whelen and an 8 twist 300 RUM

I'd never own a 308 with less than a 10 twist

Last edited by jwp475; 01/15/23.


I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,306
T
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,306
Originally Posted by TwoTrax
Your lack of comprehension is still showing itself. I doubt one more time will make any difference with you but I will give it the old college try.

I process my own game. I always do an assessment of the bullet path. There was LITTLE internal damage done along the wound channel and LITTLE bruised bloodshot meat. The internal organs were NOT turned to soup but had a small wound channel through them. Every animal required another shot. None fell at the shot.

Again you love copper bullets, I get it. My experience and those of numerous other member here and some other forums that I visit shows that not everyone has positive experiences with copper. Get over it.
Your results and mine differ, but I've never shot anything with a X bullet. The Barnes 168gr ttsx and 175gr lrx destroy the internal organs and don't really destroy the shoulder bones and there's very little blood shot meat. We were kind of thinking that the bullet created a vacuum or something because of the blood splatter coming out of the exit wound.


Life is good live it while you can.
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,462
T
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,462
Just picked up 3 boxes of 338cal TTSX Barnes at the gas station today

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 56,745
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 56,745
Originally Posted by BWalker
Blood testing is about worthless for determining your bodies lead load. Lead leaves the blood stream relatively quickly. It hides out in the bones, brain and other tissues for decades.
Mono metal bullets do not work as well as lead and copper bullets as it pertains to killing quickly, but I use them and have been for a long team because I would rather not ingest lead. YMMV.
And FWIW modern lead and copper bullets have worked well in magnums for the 35 years I've been hunting and probably worked well for before that.

BWalker,

You have stated this before in other threads, but the latest research indicates that yes, blood-testing is very helpful, despite blood leaving the blood system within 30 days after exposure.

This has been determined by the development of an effective (and quick) way to measure lead-level in bones--and this shows a strong correlation with blood levels IF they're checked reasonably frequently.

Also, the studies I've mentioned in my articles have mentioned large samples between large populations of humans, especially the European study that compared hunters versus non-hunters. Game studies have also shown interesting results, especially from animals during hunting seasons.

But my main point is that no, blood-test for lead levels are not "about worthless for determining you bodies lead load," whether in humans or other animals. Which is why so many studies, both on humans and animals, depend at least partly on them.

Additionally, my data-base of animals taken with "copper" bullets is over 200 animals, dating back to around 1990. No, they don't kill as quickly as SOME lead-cores, but the results from the past dozen years don't show nearly as much difference as earlier bullets.

Around 150 of those animals were either taken by me or Eileen. We use far more "copper" bullets these days, mostly because they kill quickly enough, without ruining as much meat, on average, as lead-cores. Over the past five years we've taken around animals up through big elk with 'em, and none has gone over 50 yards before falling.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
Originally Posted by CRS
Originally Posted by beretzs
I’m looking forward to hearing how CRS’s 1-8 twisted 270 works for him with TTSXs. I’m kinda betting it’ll be a massive blender.

Me too!
I have a rpm theory, but not enough in field experience to ponder here yet. Lest I get crucified by those that "know". cool

The fast twist is going to get a 129 LRX load worked up in addition to the heavies.

The LRX has a sleeker ogive than the TTSX and the current TSX.
The first TSX's had a similar ogive.

I hear you. I don’t know that I’d ever have enough data, but I don’t really care much, but I can say with bullets that’ll hold the RPMs the insides of those animals is literally purée.

The old Bitterroot bullets just are like death on elk for me. Maybe it’s [bleep] ass luck, but if you stick to Steigers RPM guidance they are amazing.

Bob and again, Rick D seemed to believe as well.

A 175 BBC from an 8 twist over 3k is a giant killer in my book. Love the Partitions but wound channels didn’t compare.

I don’t wanna get called on the carpet as it’s less than 10 of each but that’s enough for me, I’m not a scientist and don’t care that someone doesn’t see the same. I’ll live in bliss with my 7 MASHBURN blender gun grin

Last edited by beretzs; 01/15/23.

Semper Fi
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
Scotty - I need to learn more about what you are sharing. I’ll have to look into Steigers - It makes total sense about rpm. I’ll have to look back at my notes relating bullets performance & twist on the guns used.

This is a great topic to explore!

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,363
CRS Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,363
BC30cal,

I believe faster rpm increases tissue damage.

The other factor we must consider is bullet integrity. This is well proven, that faster rpm stresses a bullet more.
How this applies to lighter constructed hunting bullets and in field performance on big game is unknown to me.

The big question. At what point, if ever, will rpm's cause a hunting bullet to not perform as it should?

So using the rpm calculator you posted. A 1:8 barrel will be spinning a 3000fps 270 bullet at 270,000 rpm over the 216,000 rpm of a standard 1:10 twist.

A more drastic example would be 1:14 twist 22-250 vs a 1:8. 195,000rpm vs 342,000rpm. We have killed a bunch of deer/antelope with the 1:14. But I do not even have a load worked up with the 53gr TSX in the new 1:8 barrel.

Would there be a noticeable effect on game? Would rotational energy take away from penetration? Have never recovered a 53gr TSX out of an animal using the 1:14 twist. Would we suddenly start recovering bullets?

I do not know for certain.

Last edited by CRS; 01/15/23.

Arcus Venator
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,417
With RPM based upon twist I suppose that when accuracy is lost on either side of the twist spectrum performance would be compromised. So there must be a range of acceptable twists for any given bullet length & caliber. Velocity would play out in terms of how fast one could spin a bullet based upon its design. Each bullet design having its optimal twist maximizing blender effect & velocity based on individual bullets.

So new bullet boxes might read:

Minimal velocity for expansion: 1600fps
Explodes in twists over 1:3” at velocity over 2750fps
Optimal blender: 1:6
Loses stability: 1:10

*Optimal impact of 2200fps in a 1:6 twist results in perfect performance.

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,305
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,305
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Originally Posted by BWalker
Blood testing is about worthless for determining your bodies lead load. Lead leaves the blood stream relatively quickly. It hides out in the bones, brain and other tissues for decades.
Mono metal bullets do not work as well as lead and copper bullets as it pertains to killing quickly, but I use them and have been for a long team because I would rather not ingest lead. YMMV.
And FWIW modern lead and copper bullets have worked well in magnums for the 35 years I've been hunting and probably worked well for before that.

BWalker,

You have stated this before in other threads, but the latest research indicates that yes, blood-testing is very helpful, despite blood leaving the blood system within 30 days after exposure.

This has been determined by the development of an effective (and quick) way to measure lead-level in bones--and this shows a strong correlation with blood levels IF they're checked reasonably frequently.

Also, the studies I've mentioned in my articles have mentioned large samples between large populations of humans, especially the European study that compared hunters versus non-hunters. Game studies have also shown interesting results, especially from animals during hunting seasons.

But my main point is that no, blood-test for lead levels are not "about worthless for determining you bodies lead load," whether in humans or other animals. Which is why so many studies, both on humans and animals, depend at least partly on them.

Additionally, my data-base of animals taken with "copper" bullets is over 200 animals, dating back to around 1990. No, they don't kill as quickly as SOME lead-cores, but the results from the past dozen years don't show nearly as much difference as earlier bullets.

Around 150 of those animals were either taken by me or Eileen. We use far more "copper" bullets these days, mostly because they kill quickly enough, without ruining as much meat, on average, as lead-cores. Over the past five years we've taken around animals up through big elk with 'em, and none has gone over 50 yards before falling.
John, if you ingested lead today it would be out of your blood in 6 months or typically much less. It would be in your bones for decades. As such what does a blood test tell you other than you were recently exposed? You might read this.
https://labs.icahn.mssm.edu/toddlab/bone-lead-test/
FWIW they can also use a new type of Xray to analyze bone lead levels now where previously a bone biopsy was required.
Regardless I don't want to feed myself or my family any lead, period.

Last edited by BWalker; 01/15/23.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,305
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,305
Originally Posted by saddlesore
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by saddlesore
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Secondly, here in the west it is quite likely a matter of time before lead core bullets will be prohibited. Although that may not be much of a factor for you in Georgia.

Only because we live in a state that rolled over in to blue. I doubt MT and WY is close. With so few Republicans in the legislature now and Polis up for another term, what firearms we may own is may soon overshadow what we can shoot in them.

Stop it SS.
Although I’m probably more unhappy than you about Colorado being invaded by lifestyle immigrants and their politics, the science behind lead toxicity, the levels of lead toxicity in raptors, and the effect of lead toxicity on raptors, is sound.
No different than the lead shot debate 35+ years ago. Deja Vu all over again…..


Maybe raptors and water fowl, but not humans. As far as I know birds grind their food in he gizzards. Not so with humans. Lead dust in your lungs will kill you. Not so much, lead particles ingested and passed thru the intestines. I have stacked tons of lead shot and bricks for radiation shielding and have eaten lead killed rabbits, squirrels, elk deer, antelope, drank water from lead pipes when young. Many cities still deliver water in lead pipes, (Colorado Springs being one of them), many homes still have soldered copper pipe in them. Asbestos is killing me, but not lead. Only have to do a simple search of hunters
using lead bullets to see there is no viable proof. Here is one such article. https://www.themeateater.com/hunt/f...ldlife-separating-science-from-advocacy. Another farce brought on by the anti's, about like gas stoves being dangerous now.
You don't seem to grasp the problem with ingesting lead. It's not acute lead toxicity. It's chronic issues such as cognitive decline. And ingesting lead particles does result in lead entering your blood stream. That's not even debatable.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11,036
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11,036
CRS;
Good evening to you sir, I hope the weekend and the weather in the Black Hills behaved for you.

As a bit of a further back story, when we first started playing with that Swede carbine, I'd built it as a hunting rifle with fairly low recoil for my father who'd just had a pace maker installed. This was about '85 and I didn't have a chronograph then, so found out about some of the speeds later on when my good wife bought me one of the first red Shooting Chrony chronographs to hit the shelves in a store up in Kelowna.

Without looking into the notes and going off of memory, we managed to blow up 120gr Nosler Solid Base and Sierra Game Kings on local bucks. The Sierra didn't make it to the second lung on a broadside shot, just came completely unglued in the first 4".

We finally found that 140gr Partitions and Hornady Spires worked not too bad in it. I recall being surprised at the damage of one spike mulie Dad got with it and in my hunting diary noted "tissue damage similar to '06 180gr Hornady SP load".

All that to say that my strong hunch is there is a point where rpm will have a bullet not work.

Oh, should mention too that in a conversation with greydog on here who is a respected gunsmith, he mentioned that the Swede barrels had deep grooves and that seemed to tear apart cup and core bullets as well, but they typically did well with monometal bullets.

My original coyote bomber was a 26" .22-250AI with a 1:14" twist because that's what we did back then. I'd love to hear what you see with the 1:8" twist version if you're so inclined.

To your question if there'd be a noticeable difference, I think that there likely would, but it wouldn't be a huge one is my hunch.

Again I'd be interested to hear if the faster twist has you starting to find bullets and what you see in terms of tissue damage.

Lastly sir, I respect and very much echo your last sentence, "I do not know for certain"..

Me too sir, me too.

Best to you.

Dwayne


The most important stuff in life isn't "stuff"

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,634
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,634
Originally Posted by Theoldpinecricker
Just picked up 3 boxes of 338cal TTSX Barnes at the gas station today
Hah! That's quite a gas station when you can pickup bullets!


NORMAL ISN'T COMING BACK - JESUS IS.
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,515
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,515
I have used solid copper bullets. In rifles that have a high MV, they can work great, if your rifle likes them. There are lots of reasons not to use them, however. The most important reason is personal choice. If I don't want to use them, for any reason under the sun, that's good enough.

As for other states following the lead of liberal states that have outlawed lead, not likely in most states. The entire concept is nothing but an anti gun ploy to reduce the availability of affordable ammunition. Raptors are dying by the truckload in wind farms and the hippies are still ignoring that and crying about lead ammo.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,430
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,430
Originally Posted by ranger1
I have used solid copper bullets. In rifles that have a high MV, they can work great, if your rifle likes them. There are lots of reasons not to use them, however. The most important reason is personal choice. If I don't want to use them, for any reason under the sun, that's good enough.

As for other states following the lead of liberal states that have outlawed lead, not likely in most states. The entire concept is nothing but an anti gun ploy to reduce the availability of affordable ammunition. Raptors are dying by the truckload in wind farms and the hippies are still ignoring that and crying about lead ammo.

It might not be up to states if it's done federally.

Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,341
O
OGB Online Content
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,341
Originally Posted by beretzs
So do you think maybe we blame some of the older iterations of mono’s and continue holding the grudge on todays well made bullets. I don’t have near the amount of kills as some and I do think in deer monos aren’t needed but man the ones that have been shot seemed fine. There are a few that I think way further than the should’ve gone but they’re still dead at the end of the trail.

I think arguing about what another guy chooses is akin to the my 30-06 kills better than a 270…. The sheer numbers of animals and combos to prove a darned thing would take 100 of us hunting non stop to prove anything, even if that was enough not to mention the sheer crazy amount of combinations.

Dwayne’s post about RPMs seeming to help with them is music to my ears and kinda what I’ve thought to myself for awhile.

Just my thought though.

I’m looking forward to hearing how CRS’s 1-8 twisted 270 works for him with TTSXs. I’m kinda betting it’ll be a massive blender.

2 things. Your first sentence = nail, head. If you've followed MD for long he has covered how many bullets have changed over time ( most usefully I might add!)

The second thing is, where do I sign up to be on the "hunting non-stop" test board?!

I'd be all in on that for sure!


Bore size is no substitute for shot placement and
Power is no substitute for bullet performance. 458WIN
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
In thinking about the rpm theories…..I think that there may be great merit to this. I’ll go a bit farther and suggest that many people go to light, IMO too light, bullets when going to monos. The light bullets, once expanded will lose their rotation much faster than a heavier bullet…..thereby lessening/reducing the internal damage to the animal!

That’s my story….and I’m stick’n to it! memtb

Last edited by memtb; 01/16/23.

You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel

“LETS GO BRANDON”
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,363
CRS Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,363
BC30cal,

I will certainly report back. Do not know if the extensive opportunities to test the 1:8 are as readily available.

Here is some background.

Twenty years ago or so when we started using the 22-250, deer populations were extremely high and antlerless tags were abundant along with youth tags. The 22 cal mono certainly did the job without excessive meat damage. There were quite a few years where double digit deer numbers were taken. The tag situation has changed with deer numbers down and my boys all grown up.

My motivation back then was much different, that was a time when everyone "KNEW" that 22 caliber rifles were too small for deer. cool I was out to prove a point so to speak.

Through all my years of hunting, I will always prefer a tougher bullet. Would choose over penetration, over bullet blow up every time. I like mono's, as can be seen by my extensive use of them.

I have only had one hunting experience with mono's that made me pause. It was with the original Barnes X in the 90's, 140gr in my 270. Horrible to find a suitable load. Took it elk hunting in Colorado and shot an elk running through the timber. Only saw a flinch at the shot, followed the tracks through the snow. Was starting to wonder if. No blood until after I saw her piled up. Felt like she went an awful long ways, but do not recall. Did it pencil through or not? Do not remember thinking it penciled, but was not impressed with animal reaction at the shot. But hindsight has me wondering. I was still pretty green as a hunter, my first mountain hunt, first elk hunt, etc.


I later tried the XLC bullets with bad results on paper. Had given up on monos until I ran into the guy from Superior Ammo at the local range. They had just started loading the TSX's and was duly impressed with them. He said I should give them one more try. I did, have not looked back.


Arcus Venator
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
I had a Tikka 1-8 22-250 for a few years. From 40 grain Ballistic Tips to 75 AMax and ELDs and 77 TMKs shot excellent with almost no real issue getting accurate ammo.

The 77 TMK and 62 grain TTSX were rippers and kinda what I defaulted to. The 62 could probably punch elk legs. That bullet was like a drill bit and always showed good expansion on everything from woodchucks to deer.


Semper Fi
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,363
CRS Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,363
I would not hesitate to use the 53gr TSX at 3800 fps on elk.

Would prefer a 338-06 though. grin


Arcus Venator
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,363
CRS Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,363
Just checked the mail. Badlands Bullet package showed up.
224 62gr Bulldozer and 277 150gr Super Bulldozer.

Pics in a bit.

Here you go[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Last edited by CRS; 01/16/23.

Arcus Venator
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,180
Those look quite slick.


Semper Fi
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,344
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,344
I didn't read every post but have come around to the copper bullet. Like Brad I had a few 'less than desirable' experiences with 25 call, 100 gr TSX and 7mm/140. I still maintain the 25/100 did not open at all in 2 cases. The 7mm/140 prob expanded but the internal damage was very unimpressive although I did recover the deer.

As a result I swore them off - till the last few years. Once it seemed that plastic tips were added and it seemed they became more uniform in their expansion characteristics, I stuck my toe back in the copper bullet water.

I've now shot several deer and an elk with monos. I'm cautiously optimistic but have developed loads for all.my rifles with monos. The 308/150 etip is a definite winner. Driven to 2900, it shoot flat and retains enough velocity to be effective to 400 yards if the need arises.

One thing I think monos have done is make cartridges more effective. My 308 load for example. I have zero qualms using it for any bid game. I'd not purposely take it Arctos Horribilis hunting but if one showed up intent on being a jackass, I'd feel like I had a fair chance of changing his attitude without getting chewed on.

Same with the 338 fed/185 TTSX. I've not shot anything with it yet but at 2700 ft/sec it shoots flat enough to ~ 350 to be effective. In fact, I built the 338 fed in lieu of a 338-06. With all bullets except the 185 driven by the 338-06, the 338 fed/185 shoots flatter. Load the 338-06 with the 185 and it obviously starts faster and will shoot a bit flatter - but at a significant jump in recoil.

I'm about finished load development with my latest Kimber MT 270 win. A 130 LRX at 3100 shoots very flat out to reasonable ranges. I don't see the need for a 6.5 PRC given the velocity and accuracy that my 270 is capable of. And I can buy shells in walmarks if needed.

All told, I think the newer, and/or improved versions of existing, monos have changed the game. In my mind similar to 1948 with the advent of the greatest hunting bullet - Nosler Partition.

Can't say as I'm keen on mandating their use but the science is compelling. Now if Barnes would release their 30 cal/150 TTSX used in their 308 ammo as a reloading component........


Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,430
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,430
Originally Posted by bwinters
I didn't read every post but have come around to the copper bullet. Like Brad I had a few 'less than desirable' experiences with 25 call, 100 gr TSX and 7mm/140. I still maintain the 25/100 did not open at all in 2 cases. The 7mm/140 prob expanded but the internal damage was very unimpressive although I did recover the deer.

As a result I swore them off - till the last few years. Once it seemed that plastic tips were added and it seemed they became more uniform in their expansion characteristics, I stuck my toe back in the copper bullet water.

I've now shot several deer and an elk with monos. I'm cautiously optimistic but have developed loads for all.my rifles with monos. The 308/150 etip is a definite winner. Driven to 2900, it shoot flat and retains enough velocity to be effective to 400 yards if the need arises.

One thing I think monos have done is make cartridges more effective. My 308 load for example. I have zero qualms using it for any bid game. I'd not purposely take it Arctos Horribilis hunting but if one showed up intent on being a jackass, I'd feel like I had a fair chance of changing his attitude without getting chewed on.

Same with the 338 fed/185 TTSX. I've not shot anything with it yet but at 2700 ft/sec it shoots flat enough to ~ 350 to be effective. In fact, I built the 338 fed in lieu of a 338-06. With all bullets except the 185 driven by the 338-06, the 338 fed/185 shoots flatter. Load the 338-06 with the 185 and it obviously starts faster and will shoot a bit flatter - but at a significant jump in recoil.

I'm about finished load development with my latest Kimber MT 270 win. A 130 LRX at 3100 shoots very flat out to reasonable ranges. I don't see the need for a 6.5 PRC given the velocity and accuracy that my 270 is capable of. And I can buy shells in walmarks if needed.

All told, I think the newer, and/or improved versions of existing, monos have changed the game. In my mind similar to 1948 with the advent of the greatest hunting bullet - Nosler Partition.

Can't say as I'm keen on mandating their use but the science is compelling. Now if Barnes would release their 30 cal/150 TTSX used in their 308 ammo as a reloading component........

Bill, have you done any work with the 168ttsx in the .308? Since it's supposed to open at a lower velocity, I thought it may be better than the 150's. ???

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,344
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,344
I have not. The best I can get from a 165 C&C in a 308 is 2700, they start to drop off pretty good at 300. I'd guess a copper mono might not make 2700 in a 22" 308, but I'm guessing......

I wouldn't be affeared with a 150 TTSX or etip.


Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25,713
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 25,713
With a 308 and 150g TTSX, I’ve killed one elk at 120yds broadside, another at 50yds quartering away, and a pronghorn at 300yds.

In all three cases the bullet left a good exit hole and none of the critters traveled more than 30 yds.


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,430
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,430
Originally Posted by bwinters
I wouldn't be affeared with a 150 TTSX or etip.

But what if you have many hundred 168's and zero 150's? laugh

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,107
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,107
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
Is there any reason not to use copper bullets for hunting?



Nope. Hammers is my preference. LRX or TTSX is next.


https://thehandloadinglog.wordpress.com
μολὼν λαβέ

"Weatherby was too long so I nicknamed it "Bee""
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,107
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,107
Originally Posted by MAC
A couple years ago I got a 308 Win, which was a caliber I never owned. Got the reloading components and began playing with loads. Quit playing when I tried the 130 Gr Barnes TTSX over Varget powder:
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Loaded up a bunch of ammo and have been hunting with that load for the last 2 seasons. All the game below fell to that load and all were one shot kills.
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

I see NO reason to use any other bullet. If your rifle shoots all copper bullets well, and mine does, then use them with confidence.


What velocity are you getting?


https://thehandloadinglog.wordpress.com
μολὼν λαβέ

"Weatherby was too long so I nicknamed it "Bee""
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,344
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,344
Originally Posted by Teeder
Originally Posted by bwinters
I wouldn't be affeared with a 150 TTSX or etip.

But what if you have many hundred 168's and zero 150's? laugh

Classifieds <G>


Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,344
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,344
I'm not the OP, but have a 130 TTSX load for my 308. H4895 gives me just shy of 3100 (3092 avg to be exact from a 22" Kimber) at MOA.

Last edited by bwinters; 01/17/23.

Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,234
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,234
For another data point of the 130 TTSX in the .308 Win, I'm getting 3075 fps with TAC out of a 18" barrel.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,107
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,107
Thank you fellas.


https://thehandloadinglog.wordpress.com
μολὼν λαβέ

"Weatherby was too long so I nicknamed it "Bee""
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,371
E
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
E
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,371
Originally Posted by bwinters
Can't say as I'm keen on mandating their use but the science is compelling. Now if Barnes would release their 30 cal/150 TTSX used in their 308 ammo as a reloading component........

Are the 30cal. 150gr. TTSX bullets loaded in factory ammo different than the component bullets I have on the shelf?

Last edited by elkcountry; 01/17/23.

"I refuse to waste my common sense on those who have been educated beyond their intelligence"

All you need to know about Democrats is they call American citizens "Deplorables" and illegal immigrants "Dreamers"!
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,056
P
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,056
Originally Posted by elkcountry
Originally Posted by bwinters
Can't say as I'm keen on mandating their use but the science is compelling. Now if Barnes would release their 30 cal/150 TTSX used in their 308 ammo as a reloading component........

Are the 30cal. 150gr. TTSX bullets loaded in factory ammo different than the component bullets I have on the shelf?

The ones loaded in 308 are. I asked Barnes.

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,056
P
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,056
My load is 46.2 gr Varget, WLR, PMC brass, 2950 fps from a 19" barrel

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,344
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,344
Originally Posted by elkcountry
Originally Posted by bwinters
Can't say as I'm keen on mandating their use but the science is compelling. Now if Barnes would release their 30 cal/150 TTSX used in their 308 ammo as a reloading component........

Are the 30cal. 150gr. TTSX bullets loaded in factory ammo different than the component bullets I have on the shelf?

Yes. The 308/150 loaded ammo use a 150 TTSX but it's designed to expand at lower velocities (1500 if I recall correctly). The 150 TTSX component bullet needs 2000 ft/sec min velocity to expand.

The difference lies in the use. The 150 component bullet is uses by guys running 30 cal magnums at warp speed, while the 308 loaded ammo has a captive audience as it where and moves along at sub 3000 ft/sec.

Frankly I don't see the difference between the LRX at faster velocity and a 150 TTSX designed to open at a lower belocity. I'm sure there might be some lost petals but who cares - blunt nose bullet should operate like a LBT design hard cast.


Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,388
C
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,388
I don’t know why Barnes doesn’t change the whole TTSX line to open at 1500. But then it would be harder to sell the lrx I guess. Lrx straight up kill.

Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,519
P
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
P
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,519
i have purchased over a few years 8 - 257 Robert rifles all different brands but mostly Rugers for the family. my thought is for deer hunting i will load either 103 gr. or 75 gr. Hammer hunters i see no reason to shoot a bigger grain bullet anymore if we use copper bullets. with respect right or wrong myself, ladies and kids with the 75 gr. bullet still will have around 3,000 FPS , less recoil ,good accuracy and decent ballistics with a smaller cartridge too.


LIFE NRA , we vote Red up here, Norseman
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
Originally Posted by Calvin
I don’t know why Barnes doesn’t change the whole TTSX line to open at 1500. But then it would be harder to sell the lrx I guess. Lrx straight up kill.

Barnes has painted themselves into a corner by claiming near 100% weight retention. The only way is to make the 150 tougher to stand up to magnum high velocity impacts



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,757
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,757
It’s not as large a sample size as some members here, but I stopped counting the BG animals I have shot or witnessed being shot with Barnes bullets at about 150. Those bullets ranged from .243” to .338” and included X, TSX, TTSX, and LRX. I have not witnessed a failure to expand, that I could tell, and I was involved in the dressing/deboning/butchering of all or nearly all of those animals. I have noticed that the TTSX and LRX tend to expand a little more violently and do a little more damage than the X and TSX. Contrary to what others have observed, I also haven’t seen animals travel further or take longer to die than when shot with C&C bullets. In fact, my experience has been the opposite. Of course, there are many factors involved here, including the fact that shot placement has tended to be behind the front leg when using C&C bullets, and the shooter has typically been unconcerned with including bone in the wound channel (or even does it intentionally) when shooting monos.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
It’s not as large a sample size as some members here, but I stopped counting the BG animals I have shot or witnessed being shot with Barnes bullets at about 150. Those bullets ranged from .243” to .338” and included X, TSX, TTSX, and LRX. I have not witnessed a failure to expand, that I could tell, and I was involved in the dressing/deboning/butchering of all or nearly all of those animals. I have noticed that the TTSX and LRX tend to expand a little more violently and do a little more damage than the X and TSX. Contrary to what others have observed, I also haven’t seen animals travel further or take longer to die than when shot with C&C bullets. In fact, my experience has been the opposite. Of course, there are many factors involved here, including the fact that shot placement has tended to be behind the front leg when using C&C bullets, and the shooter has typically been unconcerned with including bone in the wound channel (or even does it intentionally) when shooting monos.


My experience and observations as well



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,306
T
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,306
My understanding was that the LRX would open at a lower velocity than the Ttsx for long range hunting? That would also lead me to believe that the LRX would open fast at close range?


Life is good live it while you can.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,757
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,757
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
My understanding was that the LRX would open at a lower velocity than the Ttsx for long range hunting? That would also lead me to believe that the LRX would open fast at close range?
In general, yes. But the 150 TTSX that is designed to open at 1500 fps has a lower speed threshold than most LRX and other TTSX models.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,430
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,430
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
My understanding was that the LRX would open at a lower velocity than the Ttsx for long range hunting? That would also lead me to believe that the LRX would open fast at close range?

That's my understanding, but others know more than I do. The 168ttsx fits this too.
My plan is to do some testing with the 139's in a 7-08 this year. If it works out, I'll be switching over to just using monos.

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 56,745
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 56,745
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
My understanding was that the LRX would open at a lower velocity than the Ttsx for long range hunting? That would also lead me to believe that the LRX would open fast at close range?

In reality, just about ALL expanding big game bullets open up just about as "fast" as the rest, usually within the length of the bullet after it hits hide.

The big differences are not in how fast they expand, but how violently--and how much weight they lose. Again in general, the more weight lost up to around 50%, the faster they kill, due to more tissue destruction.

The LRX is indeed designed to open at lower velocities--but so far I haven't been able to tell any difference in how they perform at "normal" ranges than TTSXs of the same approximate diameter and weight. Haven't recovered any.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 79
M
Campfire Greenhorn
Offline
Campfire Greenhorn
M
Joined: Nov 2021
Posts: 79
Both copper and lead based bullets work well nowadays, they have, are continuing to tweak them for better results.
Copper bullets are costly, and not all work well in some rifles/calibers.
Lead bullets are normally cheaper, and usually there are a several types/weights that will shoot in most rifles.
Lead bullets will leave shards of lead in some meat/bones ect , and are known to cause lead poisoning in bald eagles and other critters.
When butchering, take a couple of minutes and look around, they are there, you can, will find them.
This is becoming an issue with the eagles and throwing the deer carcass out to feed the yotes and such.
I still do this, however, I do take 5 extra minutes and cut out/chop off, any of the "wound Channel" and the 4" or so around it, and toss that in the garbage bag/can for the land fill.
I am not a bunny hugger, but I like to watch and listen to the eagles, and I do not want the dnr to MANDATE that we use copper only.
I use mostly Hornady interlocks and Sierra pro hunters, both work, no issues with either.
Getting a few copper only 358 tssx for trying out, cannot comment on those yet.
I do believe that will have copper only some time down the road, just not sure how soon.
IMO

Good luck whatever way you choose.



Let him grow, Shoot a doe !
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 34,523
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 34,523
Cutting Edge and Hammer are newer technology copper bullets. They’re more expansive than Barnes, designed to frag.

Not sure about CEB, but Hammer offers bullets of varying degrees of expansion with different percentages remaining in the core. Pretty interesting concept. One can match velocity with critter being hunted, for optimal terminal performance. Accuracy is excellent.

Expensive but IMO, worth it.

DF

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,983
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Cutting Edge and Hammer are newer technology copper bullets. They’re more expansive than Barnes, designed to frag.

Not sure about CEB, but Hammer offers bullets of varying degrees of expansion with different percentages remaining in the core. Pretty interesting concept. One can match velocity with critter being hunted, for optimal terminal performance. Accuracy is excellent.

Expensive but IMO, worth it.

DF

Way Too expensive for those that walk to their hunting location, consume no food or beverages when hunting, do not pay hunting lease fees or spend thousands of $ on guided hunts, ect.

Everyone knows that the bullets fired during the hunting season are the most expensive part of hunting! 😉 memtb

Last edited by memtb; 01/20/23.

You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel

“LETS GO BRANDON”
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,045
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,045
Originally Posted by jwp475
Barnes has painted themselves into a corner by claiming near 100% weight retention.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

The larger bullet above (next to a recovered .243 bullet in the second pic) is a 225gr .338 TTSX, shot out of a 26” 340 Wby: -- hit a moose in the right-rear ribs at about 3,040 fps; went through about 4-1/2 feet of moose; ended up breaking the left front shoulder; and ended up under the hide by the shoulder. IIRC, it now weighs 196 grains. So, after all of that, it retained about 87%, but not 100%, of its weight.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,430
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,430
Originally Posted by MarineHawk
Originally Posted by jwp475
Barnes has painted themselves into a corner by claiming near 100% weight retention.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

The larger bullet above (next to a recovered .243 bullet in the second pic) is a 225gr .338 TTSX, shot out of a 26” 340 Wby: -- hit a moose in the right-rear ribs at about 3,040 fps; went through about 4-1/2 feet of moose; ended up breaking the left front shoulder; and ended up under the hide by the shoulder. IIRC, it now weighs 196 grains. So, after all of that, it retained about 87%, but not 100%, of its weight.

Complete Failure! wink

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
Originally Posted by MarineHawk
Originally Posted by jwp475
Barnes has painted themselves into a corner by claiming near 100% weight retention.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

The larger bullet above (next to a recovered .243 bullet in the second pic) is a 225gr .338 TTSX, shot out of a 26” 340 Wby: -- hit a moose in the right-rear ribs at about 3,040 fps; went through about 4-1/2 feet of moose; ended up breaking the left front shoulder; and ended up under the hide by the shoulder. IIRC, it now weighs 196 grains. So, after all of that, it retained about 87%, but not 100%, of its weight.


I have zero problems with that performance



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
Originally Posted by MarineHawk
Originally Posted by jwp475
Barnes has painted themselves into a corner by claiming near 100% weight retention.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

The larger bullet above (next to a recovered .243 bullet in the second pic) is a 225gr .338 TTSX, shot out of a 26” 340 Wby: -- hit a moose in the right-rear ribs at about 3,040 fps; went through about 4-1/2 feet of moose; ended up breaking the left front shoulder; and ended up under the hide by the shoulder. IIRC, it now weighs 196 grains. So, after all of that, it retained about 87%, but not 100%, of its weight.


I have zero problems with that performance



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,107
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,107
LRX 175 gr 30 cal on elk from 30-378. 3470 muzzle velocity. 270 yard shot.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

416 Bee 300 gr TSX at 3150 fps. Antelope at 363 yards. Exit wound. I say they expanded.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


https://thehandloadinglog.wordpress.com
μολὼν λαβέ

"Weatherby was too long so I nicknamed it "Bee""
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,045
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,045
Originally Posted by Fotis
416 Bee 300 gr TSX at 3150 fps. Antelope at 363 yards. Exit wound. I say they expanded.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Dang!!! Are you sure you brought enough gun for that?

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,107
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,107
LOL I think so!
I am working on my 460 Bee this year. 404 gr hammers at 3000 fps via RL17!


https://thehandloadinglog.wordpress.com
μολὼν λαβέ

"Weatherby was too long so I nicknamed it "Bee""
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 678
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 678
I have limited experience with monos, but I did have one "pencil" a large buck a few years back. TTSX 185 grain out of a 338 Federal. Shot behind the shoulder at 250 yards. He died, but did run a fair distance and spilled very little blood. Exit hole diameter was same as entry. Do they work? Sure. Most likely due to slower velocities and not smacking bone, but that experience tarnished my confidence in that particular load. Just my 2 cents...

Last edited by techfish; 01/24/23.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,757
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,757
Originally Posted by techfish
I have limited experience with monos, but I did have one "pencil" a large buck a few years back. TTSX 185 grain out of a 338 Federal. Shot behind the shoulder at 250 yards. He died, but did run a fair distance and spilled very little blood. Exit hole diameter was same as entry. Do they work? Sure. Most likely due to slower velocities and not smacking bone, but that experience tarnished my confidence in that particular load. Just my 2 cents...
How was the internal damage?

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 678
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 678
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
Originally Posted by techfish
I have limited experience with monos, but I did have one "pencil" a large buck a few years back. TTSX 185 grain out of a 338 Federal. Shot behind the shoulder at 250 yards. He died, but did run a fair distance and spilled very little blood. Exit hole diameter was same as entry. Do they work? Sure. Most likely due to slower velocities and not smacking bone, but that experience tarnished my confidence in that particular load. Just my 2 cents...
How was the internal damage?
The bullet hit the bottom of both lungs, so the cavity was blood filled. The damage was clearly there, but nothing like a NBT or SGK. Again, lots of variables and one instance...

Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,341
O
OGB Online Content
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 1,341
Fotis' gun safe makes mine look like a box of puppies.


Bore size is no substitute for shot placement and
Power is no substitute for bullet performance. 458WIN
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,989
L
LBP Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
L
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,989
I have very limited experience with copper bullets a whitetail and a mouflon, in both of those cases it seamed to be slower killing. Both animals were shot through the lungs and both went well over 100 yards. Based on this limited experience I have stuck with conventional and bonded bullets instead.


Will Munny: It's a hell of a thing, killing a man. Take away all he's got and all he's ever gonna have.

The Schofield Kid: Yeah, well, I guess they had it coming.

Will Munny: We all got it coming, kid.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,107
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,107
Originally Posted by OGB
Fotis' gun safe makes mine look like a box of puppies.




Lol


https://thehandloadinglog.wordpress.com
μολὼν λαβέ

"Weatherby was too long so I nicknamed it "Bee""
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,045
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,045
Originally Posted by LBP
I have very limited experience with copper bullets a whitetail and a mouflon, in both of those cases it seamed to be slower killing. Both animals were shot through the lungs and both went well over 100 yards. Based on this limited experience I have stuck with conventional and bonded bullets instead.

What type of bullet/cartridge? What velocity?

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,989
L
LBP Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
L
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,989
In both cases it was a .223. One was the 53gr tsx and the other was a 55gr tsx. The whitetail was taken at about 50 yards. The mouflon was about 100 yards. Muzzle velocity in both cases was about 3300 fps.


Will Munny: It's a hell of a thing, killing a man. Take away all he's got and all he's ever gonna have.

The Schofield Kid: Yeah, well, I guess they had it coming.

Will Munny: We all got it coming, kid.
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,426
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,426
Going to south Texas on a hog hunt next week.

Decided to try something different, so I snagged some .224, 55gr tsx.

Loaded them in my custom 22/250, over 35 5 of varget.

Getting half moa or better, at 3700.

Thinking they should do wondrous things to hogs.

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 997
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 997
For those that like the solid copper bullet, you might want to look at the LEHIGH DEFENSE line of bullets. They have come out with several new styles and they are available . A video I saw last week showed their new manufacturing plant in NE Texas producing about 400,000 bullet a week. The bullets can be bought thru WILSON COMBAT in North Arkansas, Berryville.

Last edited by DLALLDER; 01/27/23.







Joined: May 2014
Posts: 8,813
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 8,813
I can't think of any bullets made out of copper. But I think they made them maybe a century ago???


Life member NRA
I prefer classic.
Semper Fi - SGT
I used to run with the hare. Now I'm envious of the tortoise.
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 34,523
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 34,523
Originally Posted by OGB
Fotis' gun safe makes mine look like a box of puppies.
He do have some hosses in his safe.

I'm now on a mission to load Absolute Hammer bullets. As you know, they're designed so the ogive doesn't engrave the rifling, the only thing touching the bore is the patented, low friction driving bands. Thus, they can be pushed at higher velocities, often 150 fps and even more more above conventional loads. And, to fill the case with enough powder to get those speeds, faster than usual powder is needed.

I've ordered 15 bullet samples for a number of rounds. Say for example, H-4350 is the typical powder for a round, you may now be using Varget or similar burn rate.

They also recommend good neck tension for these slippery bullets. I don't have bench rest type sizers to swap out bushings, so I use a Lee Factory Crimp to insure good neck tension. I know some don't crimp, just going with the recommendation for adequate neck tension. In my case, that's the easiest way to get there.

The Shock Hammer that I've used opens a bit faster than the Hammer Hunter with its smaller 1.5 mm HP. The Shock Hammer has 80% core retention, whereas the Hunter has 60-70% retention. The Absolute Hammer has the same HP as the Hunter, both high BC bullets for LR shooting.

It changes the dynamic when you can get .300 WM performance out of an '06, .300 RUM performance out of a .300 WM. Even that infamous "man bun" round comes alive, running with the big boys, like 109 gr. AH at 3,200-3,300 fps. Yeah...

Interesting stuff. Check it out.

DF

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,161
L
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
L
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,161
Originally Posted by BWalker
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Originally Posted by BWalker
Blood testing is about worthless for determining your bodies lead load. Lead leaves the blood stream relatively quickly. It hides out in the bones, brain and other tissues for decades.
Mono metal bullets do not work as well as lead and copper bullets as it pertains to killing quickly, but I use them and have been for a long team because I would rather not ingest lead. YMMV.
And FWIW modern lead and copper bullets have worked well in magnums for the 35 years I've been hunting and probably worked well for before that.

BWalker,

You have stated this before in other threads, but the latest research indicates that yes, blood-testing is very helpful, despite blood leaving the blood system within 30 days after exposure.

This has been determined by the development of an effective (and quick) way to measure lead-level in bones--and this shows a strong correlation with blood levels IF they're checked reasonably frequently.

Also, the studies I've mentioned in my articles have mentioned large samples between large populations of humans, especially the European study that compared hunters versus non-hunters. Game studies have also shown interesting results, especially from animals during hunting seasons.

But my main point is that no, blood-test for lead levels are not "about worthless for determining you bodies lead load," whether in humans or other animals. Which is why so many studies, both on humans and animals, depend at least partly on them.

Additionally, my data-base of animals taken with "copper" bullets is over 200 animals, dating back to around 1990. No, they don't kill as quickly as SOME lead-cores, but the results from the past dozen years don't show nearly as much difference as earlier bullets.

Around 150 of those animals were either taken by me or Eileen. We use far more "copper" bullets these days, mostly because they kill quickly enough, without ruining as much meat, on average, as lead-cores. Over the past five years we've taken around animals up through big elk with 'em, and none has gone over 50 yards before falling.
John, if you ingested lead today it would be out of your blood in 6 months or typically much less. It would be in your bones for decades. As such what does a blood test tell you other than you were recently exposed? You might read this.
https://labs.icahn.mssm.edu/toddlab/bone-lead-test/
FWIW they can also use a new type of Xray to analyze bone lead levels now where previously a bone biopsy was required.
Regardless I don't want to feed myself or my family any lead, period.

That may be true about the bone retention, but the lead in my ass seems to be forever.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 29,561
Originally Posted by techfish
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
Originally Posted by techfish
I have limited experience with monos, but I did have one "pencil" a large buck a few years back. TTSX 185 grain out of a 338 Federal. Shot behind the shoulder at 250 yards. He died, but did run a fair distance and spilled very little blood. Exit hole diameter was same as entry. Do they work? Sure. Most likely due to slower velocities and not smacking bone, but that experience tarnished my confidence in that particular load. Just my 2 cents...
How was the internal damage?
The bullet hit the bottom of both lungs, so the cavity was blood filled. The damage was clearly there, but nothing like a NBT or SGK. Again, lots of variables and one instance...



The damage indicates expansion exit in hide isn't a good indicator of no expansion, but the internal damage is a good indicator of expansion



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,666
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,666
I have started shooting copper again. Simply because I’m close to retirement and I have great expectations of traveling out west and hunting. Whether or not I do is another story. Anyhow I bought a Nosler 21 300 win mag for myself as a gift and I’ve ran the old 150 XLC and the 175 LRX bullets out of it this year. I’ve had two separate experiences. I shot a 425 lb black bear with the 150 and it was lights out. I shot a big mature WT doe through the ribs with the 175 and she took off for over 100 yards . Both dead but it raised some doubt because I was shooting copper and all the history of it. After mulling over it I just said screw it and that I’m over thinking it. I remember shooting WT deer before with an ‘06 that ran when shooting cup and core bullets. 150 Mag Tips, 165 Interlocks, 180 BTs and 220 RN. Sometimes they run. Sometimes they are spooked a little, not necessarily from you, and they have a bump of adrenaline, or a big gulp of air and they just go. Unless you take out a couple of wheels, break shoulders and bang up meat they can go.


Keep your powder dry and stay frosty my friends.
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 16,650
W
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
W
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 16,650
Never fired a mono in any of my rifles in my life. I guess with over 500 head of big game, I really don't think I need them. Another way to make sales of things not needed.


Molon Labe
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 34,523
D
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
D
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 34,523
Originally Posted by WyoCoyoteHunter
Never fired a mono in any of my rifles in my life. I guess with over 500 head of big game, I really don't think I need them. Another way to make sales of things not needed.
Unless you lived in CA.

Then you’d be thinking mono.

At least mono technology is advancing; shooting mono won’t be a hindrance vs shooting lead.

In fact it could even be better.

DF

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 10,867
R
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
R
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 10,867
My early experiences with copper bullets were using a 270 and the 140 gr. X bullets. What a crock! Piss poor bullets, not sure if even one actually expanded. Virtually every deer or hog hit through the chest acted like they were trying to win an Olympic marathon! I cursed Barnes for years after that fiasco. Well a few years ago I got several boxes of .243 diameter 80 grain TTSX bullets. Loaded them where the full diameter bottom of the bullet was even with the neck of the case, this gave me an immediate accurate load with a max charge of I4350. Don't know how fast they were going but that combination is good for just about anything you want to shoot with a 243. Still weak blood trails but that seems to be a 243 thing anyway. When they were gone did I buy any more? Nope.

Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
CTV
Who's Online Now
393 members (1lesfox, 257 mag, 22250rem, 2500HD, 12344mag, 1lessdog, 42 invisible), 1,281 guests, and 1,065 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
RR2/3-22



 







Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2023 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.062s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 1.7333 MB (Peak: 2.7879 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2023-02-14 12:16:28 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS